SELECTIVE PERSECUTION

Actually the legal term is selective prosecution and forbidden by the 14th Amendment as violating equal protection under the law. Basically it means that you can’t have two people who did the same thing and only prosecute one. I saw today that a federal judge, I think in California but somewhere on the left coast, threw out a case against a group of apparently ‘white supremacists’, having to do with all the crap that took place during the summer of 2020. And I’ve probably screwed up the facts a little because I am doing stream of consciousness, but the point is that he threw out the case because all the blm and antifa crazies who engaged in similar activities were let off. HURRAY! It’s about time.

Now this is important because the judge in the Trump documents case in Florida indicated in her opinion turning down the request to throw out the charges based on the argument that the presidential records act was vague and unconstitutional that they might want to pursue a selective prosecution case. She asked questions about how many other presidents have been prosecuted for document retention and got the answer zero. This is particularly relevant because Magoo was just found to have knowingly violated the law but was given a pass. File the motion and end the nonsense!