There are now three cases in front of the Supreme Court that are directly related to the election.

First there is the issue of whether some state court judge or official, like the state Secretary of State, can take Trump off the ballot. I think the answer is pretty clear and I expect at least an 8-1 decision from the Supremes. There are only three requirements under the constitution. You’ve got to be at least 35 years old, have been a resident of the US for 14 years and in the words of Bruce Springsteen been ‘Born in the USA’! That’s it and no state can change the constitution. That’s why even if Trump gets convicted of something, he can still run for president.

The second case, and I’m not sure if Trump has joined this case or not, involves the construction of obstructing an official proceeding. At least two hundred of the J6 defendants have been charged under that statutory provision. And of great importance, a significant number of the charges in Smith’s J6 case against Trump are based on that statute. Thus if the Supremes find that that statute is not relevant, a large portion of smith’s bogus case goes up in smoke. And I think that that’s what they will do because first of all, at least 4 justices must vote to grant certiorari and hear the case. And the statute involved is an outgrowth of the Enron or Exxon case and never considered that it would be used in the way it is.

And lastly there is the question of presidential immunity. This is more complicated because the constitution doesn’t specifically grant any immunity to the president. It does however grant immunity to senators and representatives.

The Speech or Debate Clause is a clause in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 6, Clause 1). The clause states that “The Senators and Representatives” of Congress“shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrestduring their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.”

This maybe necessary because the framers were concerned with things like the president arresting opposition party members to keep them from voting on legislation. However it is clearly subject to gross abuse without recourse. There is nothing to stop one of these officials from getting up at the podium where we see them all the time giving insane speeches about pretty much anything. There is nothing to stop them from saying you’re having sex with all your children and the family pets and you would defenseless.

BTW if you recall that’s why I said that Kyle Rittenhouse should sue Magoo for defamation because he was neither a senator or VP when he made the remarks.

I have looked at the cases and I’m sure they will recognize some immunity for Trump but I don’t know how far it will go and I hope that they address the issue of whether any immunity lasts beyond his term. Magoo waived Trump’s immunity which I don’t think he can but if he can it would be good to know so that when Trump wins he can immediately waive Magoo and Obama privileges and get all their crap into the public domain.

I guess this isn’t really helpful but it does explain the need for the Supremes to take up the case, contrary to all the bs being spewed by the MSM. Future presidents need to know the boundaries of their privilege and whether it makes them less likely to make tough but necessary decisions.

Just a quick update to let you know that I haven’t forgotten the subject and their models are intentional bs.

Sorry I forgot this earlier but everyday more and more studies come out showing that not only do the shots not work but they are hazardous to your health. I have previously indicated that I would not continue to cover this because I don’t want to alarm all you who either voluntarily or because of ultimatums about your health got the shot. However two things have happened recently that made me decide to comment. First I saw a study that indicated that either 500k or one million died from taking the shot and the second is that knowing that the shots don’t work and are also dangerous, I continue to see TV and radio adds trying to get you to get the latest concoction.

I don’t understand why there are no class actions for people trying to get their jobs back and back pay because they refused to get the falsely promoted jab that didn’t do anything to stop the spread of covid. To me to continue the advertising of this dangerous concoction is equivalent to the continued advertising of cigarettes when the risks were known and not disclosed.

Come on folks let’s get some class actions going against the drug companies and also against the government and corporations who required harmful shots.

Magoo went on some late night talk show and trying to be funny, which he never is intentionally, in an effort to say Trump was senile said he couldn’t even remember his wife’s name. The reality is that when Trump was speaking at CPAC on Saturday he made a comment about Mercedes and the left went crazy saying he was talking about Melania and screwed up her name. Now before going further let’s not forget that Magoo confused his wife and his sister.

Back to my point, Matt Schlapp and his wife Mercedes were sitting in the front row and Trump was clearly talking to her. This was confirmed by Chris Plante on his radio program today. He was sitting in the second row right behind the Schlapp’s and confirmed that Trump was addressing Mercedes. In most things that I have seen today, this fact was ignored.

I love the fact that the left’s obsession with identity politics has finally come to bite them in the ass. It will be interesting to see how it works out in Michigan today. Eventually when you divide everyone into racial groups eventually it is going to bite you in the ass. You can’t cater to both Muslims and Jews . Inevitably they are going to square off against one another and then how do you represent both?

I have wondered for years, at least since Obama, why Jews support the Dems who are so obviously antisemitic. It has finally reached the breaking point in this election. The squad is demanding that Magoo support Hamas and that is clearly antisemitic. Magoo is caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place and no matter what he does it will cost him votes. The Jews might not vote for Trump, although it appears that many might, but if one group decides not to vote, it will help Trump.

KARMA!!

This is a difficult issue. IVF, as I’m sure you know stands for In Vitro Fertilization and is a procedure where an egg from a WOMAN is fertilized by sperm from a MAN in a test tube, hence the vitro portion which stands for glass and led to the term test tube babies.

The process is used to create an embryo which can then be inserted into a womb and provide a child for a woman or a couple who can’t successfully reproduce the fun way. In this process typically they create multiple embryos because there is no guarantee that the first implant will carry to term. I know that my daughter had at least three tries before success and resulted in my beautiful granddaughter.

The unused embryos are typically frozen in case the first try doesn’t work. And this leads to the problem that I think was wrongly addressed by the Alabama Supreme Court. I’m all for protecting human life but suppose you created ten embryos and the first took. Then you have nine embryos that are determined to be human beings and typically they would be destroyed. What does that court think should be done with these ‘babies’? Are you required to try for nine more babies?

This is the problem that can occur when you go too far to stop abortions. Yes prevent abortions after 15 weeks. No don’t apply the same rules to frozen embryos as you do to live and growing in the womb babies.

I would love to see a statute that would require a judge to pay the difference between what his appraisal was and the actual appraisal of a panel of experts. The asshole in New York would never have done what he did because it would have resulted in his bankruptcy. That law would never be passed unfortunately.

There does happen to be at least one Supreme Court decision that would support this. When you get an assessment that your car is valued at X , you can say fine pay me that amount. Similarly with respect to the valuation of your property, although it’s extremely unlikely because properties are generally valued at less than full value, you can say sold and they have to pay you that amount or change the valuation.

Today I learned, as most of you did also, that Trump will have to put up the over $450 million that Engoron fined him before he can appeal. That’s a ridiculous requirement which explains why the leftist judge set the fine at such a ridiculously high amount.

Remember this is under a statute that requires no wrongdoing. No one was defrauded or harmed in any way. The lenders all got paid back on time and said they would love to do more business with Trump. Also remember that the trial was just over damages for no damage. The unprofessional joke of a judge had unilaterally found Trump guilty of fraud although there was none which makes his finding all the more laughable.

Now what dawned on me today is that this was a well thought out approach to damage trump’s presidential campaign. A normal verdict would be appealed before payment. Thus Trump could appeal and get it reversed without putting up, essentially civil bail. However now Trump has to come up with a serious amount of money just to appeal and have the money returned but too late to stop the damage done. Thus this was the perfect statute to fuck with Trump. You could find him guilty without actually proving any fraud or that anyone was damaged. And then you could just impose a huge fine to interfere with his campaign.

I personally think that the statute will be declared unconstitutional if it ever gets out of NY and to the Supremes. I don’t think you can have a legitimate law that requires no proof of anyone being defrauded or injured in anyway and then just make up a fine out of thin air. Essentially it gives the state an unfettered right to arbitrarily take any amount of money from you.

I think the verdict will be overturned in New York because the obvious repercussions are already making public officials try to differentiate Trump from anyone else because people are pointing out that you’d be crazy to conduct business in NY, given what this case demonstrates.

First as if we don’t need more reminders that academia has gone over to the dark side, a few of them put out some completely bizarre paper ranking Magoo as I think the 14th best president of all time and Trump as the worst president of all time. Now I don’t know enough about all the presidents to offer my opinions but I can confidently say that Magoo wouldn’t make the top fifty, and Trump would be in my top ten or better. Certainly during my voting years, I would rank him as number one.

This group ranked Lincoln as number one and I don’t really have a problem with that, one of their criteria was unifying the country. Lincoln’s election led to the country breaking in half and engaging in civil war..

Magoo has attacked half the country and has now resulted in division in his own party between the antisemities and the sane folks. I don’t see how dissing 70% of the country is unifying.

Another thing that I find interesting is all the left’s excitement about the idiotic decision on Trump’s bank loans. Quite frankly the judge should be removed and then disbarred. His bias was evident to anyone with a brain and he’s clearly not very bright. Now the verdict will undoubtedly be reversed and even a large number of pundits on the left are questioning it. And I don’t believe that it will have any effect on the election because it is so outrageous. He evaluated Mar-a-Largo at $18 million and everyone has said it’s closer to a billion.

Lastly, the jury is still out on the now indicted whistleblower who said the Biden’s got a lot of money from I think China, I don’t remember and it really doesn’t matter. Listen. Christopher Steele never got indicted for the Russia hoax, nor anyone else providing false information about Trump. And there is a ton of other evidence about the Biden family criminal enterprise.

So I’m not going to make any decision on whether or not he’s guilty or this is just another Magoo action to cover his crimes.

I know I said presidential immunity would be next but it will wait — particularly if the Supreme Court decides to take it up. Then there will be plenty of time.

I am writing today about the Tushy trial. I managed to watch some of it and it wasn’t very enjoyable. As I have said previously. I find most litigation to be boring and not very competent. The one thing that came out is that Tushy is claiming she paid for her part of all the lavish trips in cash, and neither her nor her paramour can provide any evidence to support that. No withdrawal slips or bank statements to support the nonsense they are spouting.

I almost didn’t write this because although I had started before the Five came on, they covered everything pretty well.