MORE INDICTMENT THOUGHTS

You know I am more confident in my conspiracy theory than ever today, and the reason is that it occurred to me today that Bragg is just doing what Pelosi did. She impeached Trump twice knowing that the senate would never convict. She didn’t care. What she wanted was to be able to say she impeached him. And that’s what he’s doing. He’s already getting all the kudos and will forever be a hero on the left.

And btw an indictment is just like an impeachment. It has no legal significance. It’s meaningless unless you can follow through with a conviction and she couldn’t and he can’t and knows it but in both cases they got what they wanted. All the idiots on the left wetting their pants with meaningless glee.

Now something I want to continue to harp on is the statute of limitations problem. It’s not something that can be tossed aside. If it’s five years and you bring the case in seven, it’s thrown out. There’s no discretion. We’ll have to wait to see what’s actually in the indictment but if it’s the same charges we’ve been hearing, a judge would have no choice but to throw the case out.

Today I heard Clay and Buck and Hannity and others saying that the judges in New York were Dem partisans and so would ignore statutory laws and let the case go to trial. I disagree. I have dealt with a lot of judges and administrative judges and the one thing they don’t want to be is reversed on appeal. Particularly if it is a clear statutory violation which would open them up to not only a reversal but potentially an opinion brutally criticizing them. They are not going to open themselves to that.