Alright as I have been saying, it is becoming more and more evident that the so-called science is just a bunch of guesses by people who love the limelight and are thrilled that their SWAG is controlling this country. I have pointed out previous respected experts who have questioned the supposed efficacy of social distancing and the lockdown. Below is a link to an article that lays out the conclusions of an Israeli expert who actually did the work and concluded that their is no difference in the outcomes between countries who locked down and those who didn’t.

https://townhall.com/columnists/marinamedvin/2020/04/21/israeli-professor-debunks-government-claims-that-lockdowns-slow-coronavirus-infection-proves-worldwide-decline-in-spread-n2567291

Furthermore, I have previously talked about the Stanford study of the actual infection rate in Santa Clara country in California as compared to the diagnosed infection rate. It is 50 to 85 times higher than the diagnosed numbers. This means that the actual mortality rate is about the same as the rate for the common flu.

Now before I continue, I have to point out that yesterday Rush had what appeared to be a Biden moment. In the middle of a rant about the subject of my previous paragraph, he totally lost his place and then when he finally remembered what he wanted to say, he confused the death rate with the actual number of deaths. He seemed to think that the death rate and the mortality rate were different things. They are not. They are the same thing. In the determination of how deadly this is, the numerator is the actual number of deaths and the denominator is the total number of infections. Now I was willing to give him a pass but he did it again today!

Now it has also come out today that USC did a study and found that in LA the actual infection rate is 30 to 55 times higher than the the diagnosed cases. This is consistent with the Stanford study.

The reason that I am pointing this out is because on the way to the cigar store today I heard on Rush that yesterday Dr. Birx was asked about the USC study and he played her response. Her response was basically a bunch of gobbledygook about a-symptomatic versus symptomatic folks and age groups. Now here’s what she said and Rush didn’t pick up on. She said that this is our working hypothesis and there IS NO DATA TO SUPPORT IT but we are sticking with it because we think it’s the best way to go.

Here’s the link.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp-video/mmvo82317893769

Are you willing to put your future in the hands of people who are making it up as they go with an incentive to preach Armageddon so they can stay on TV?