Last night I postulated that Magoo was involved in temporarily ending the strike because its continuation could result in a loss in November. Today the article cited below came out stated that Magoo pressured the management organization to cave to the union to end it.

So I guess I made a lucky guess based on past events and intuition. it doesn’t say that the reason was because it was hurting SK’s chances in November but it is interesting that Magoo didn’t pressure the ILA to soften its demands. Magoo wants to end the strike but not lose his union creds.

https://pjmedia.com/rick-moran/2024/10/04/biden-forces-settlement-in-dockworkers-strike-guess-who-came-out-the-big-winner-n4933061

Today the strike was called off until January 15th, after the election. My take and I haven’t seen this anywhere but it’s pretty obvious is that after Magoo and SK came out in favor of the union, it turned out that they were going to be blamed for all the problems that would occur. Magoo refused to invoke Taft-Hartley because he wanted to support unions.

However when it became apparent that their stance would cost them way more votes than they would gain, suddenly, miraculously the issue got put off until after the election. They have no moral compass. Just what helps them keep power.

I just remembered a fact I wanted Vance to bring up when Walz bragged about record oil and gas production in Minnesota. No one has mentioned it so I will. The present oil and gas production in Minnesota is not because of Magoo and SK but in spite of them. It takes several years to develop and produce oil and gas. It doesn’t happen overnight. Today’s production is because of Trump’s policies not Magoo’s. And I know Vance knows it and should have brought it up.

One thing Vance should have done was call out the nonsense of the supposed bipartisan border bill. It would enshrine the present influx of illegals and give the president the right to allow even more and do nothing to improve the border. What he could have also pointed out that the supposed bipartisan bill got no republican support in the House and failed initially in the Senate and when it came up for a second vote failed even worse with many Democrats voting against it. And none of them ever bring up HR 2 which is a real border bill which Schumer has refused to bring to the floor.

And he should have pointed out, that the Iran agreement, which even Obama admitted, allowed Iran to build the nuclear bomb.

First I think it was obvious from the start that it was three against one and it didn’t phase Vance. I think that Walz did better than expected and was better than SK in that he at least tried to answer follow up questions. He lied continuously and used a lot of his time claiming that Minnesota was the top in country on all kinds of things like healthcare and childcare etc and I expect that he will be fact checked tomorrow and found wanting.

Observation, I noticed that Walz was continuously scribbling notes and Vance seldom did because he is clearly intellectually superior.

Vance won but missed several opportunities to score more points. (Again this is off the top of my head so I will probably miss a few things I wanted to say and maybe I will remember them tomorrow.) These are in no particular order but Vance held his feet to the fire on killing of babies who survived abortions and then were left to die. There are on average six such cases each year in Minnesota under Walz. Putting actual numbers in front of America would have been more effective and painted Walz in a corner.

I did enjoy Vance frequently stealing SK’s thunder by pointing out his middle class background, although I would argue that he actually started out in the lower class and rose above it.

He should have called out Walz for saying that the problem is guns not the people using them. Guns don’t pull their own triggers, Alex Baldwin to the contrary notwithstanding.

I understand that Walz is not a lawyer but Vance went to Yale Law School and should have known that the ‘you can’t yell fire in a crowded theater’ case has long been overturned. It was Walz basis for questioning the first amendment and Vance should have called him on it.

When Walz talked about apparently Trump trying to put his opposition in jail, I expected Vance to point out that that is exactly what they are trying to do to Trump.

I was surprised that when Walz kept talking about J6 and violence and destruction, Vance did not once mention that he let Minneapolis burn to the ground. He could have thrown it in when Walz was talking about how great housing was in his state. Really?

I was very disappointed that Vance didn’t challenge the Project 2025 nonsense.

I was also disappointed that he didn’t challenge Walz on his nonsense about Trump mishandling Covid. They say it all the time and no one ever asks them to explain how? And he had the golden opportunity to ask Walz who it was that unconstitutionally shut down Minnesotan businesses and schools? And set up a snitch line?

I wish that he had challenged Walz on the court cases dismissing Trump’s challenges to the election. All or almost all those cases were never adjudicated on the merits. They were tossed out on standing or laches. Vance could have pointed out that at least two state supreme courts have ruled that the 2020 election was unconstitutional in their state.

He could have used Walz lying about his Hong Kong lie to bring up his false military claims.

I’m sure there’s more but that’s all I can remember for now.

I can’t wait to see how the presstitutes spin it. Even HFJ said Walz got slaughtered.

While I do believe that listening to SK is much like listening to Professor Corey, there is one huge difference. He was a comedic intellectual genius who knew exactly what he was saying. She’s a complete moron who doesn’t even know what the hell she is saying.

Late last night instead of listening to music on YouTube, I watched old videos of Corey on Mike Douglas and Merv Griffin and laughed my ass off. I would highly recommend it.

I came across this article today and then Levin said the same thing on his program tonight. In case you don’t know who he is, I have talked about him before and he was a great comedian who billed himself as the World’s Foremost Authority. He was hilarious giving ultra-intelligent sounding rants on any subject that said nothing. Both the article below and Levin have compared SK to him and the parallel is spot on.

Came across this today and it makes a point that I and others here have said for years and destroys a presstitute. Enjoy.

https://twitchy.com/samj/2024/09/29/chris-martz-olivia-juliana-climate-change-schooling-n2401549

It dawned on me listening to SK tonight that she is really smart to avoid public speaking altogether. I’ve been critical of her inability to speak off teleprompter because she’s incapable of responding to questions. She just doesn’t have the smarts.

However I realized tonight, listening to her read a multitude of lies, that the more she talks the more annoying I find her voice and mannerisms. She’s a terrible speaker! It grates on my nerves to watch and listen to her. They should keep her in the basement. Every time she opens her mouth, she alienates more people.

As I have been suggesting for sometime, SK doesn’t have the mental ability or agility to be a successful prosecutor. I have questioned her claims of prosecuting transnational drug cartels because there’s no way she could concentrate for the amount of time necessary.

Well it turns out that someone actually did the research and there is no evidence that she ever was the ‘first chair’ in any prosecution ever. She was a buffoon. (Sounds a lot like the McDonald story.)

In case you don’t know, first chair is the lead prosecutor responsible for trying the case. I can’t tell you how bad you would have to be to have never been the lead in 13 or more years supposedly trying cases. As I’ve mentioned before due to the fact that the division I was in didn’t try cases until after I got there, I was always first chair throughout my career and it blows my mind to think how bad she must have been to have never been the lead.

https://twitchy.com/samj/2024/09/26/cant-find-evidence-that-kamala-led-a-single-case-as-a-prosecutor-n2401425