I’m sure most of you have seen the video of the federal officer unlocking the gate and allowing illegals to pour through and it struck me the wrong way and I should have probably ranted earlier but no one is covering it in the way I would.

First I assume you know that the fence and the gate were on private property and not the property of the federal government. So on what authority can they just come into private property and force you to let criminals on your property? It sounds to me like the 5th amendment taking clause cases I suggested during the lockdowns. Lawsuits should be filed!

Maybe file a trespass case against the officers involved unless they had a warrant and didn’t see one or hear about one. Until citizens fight back in court, Magoo’s Gestapo needs to know that they can’t do anything they want with impunity.

Today I saw an article talking about the reasons Trump shouldn’t run again and it was by a person who voted for Trump twice and there was the usual he’ll be too old et cetera but the one point he made is that Trump would be a lame duck on his first day in office because he couldn’t run in 2028. And I got to thinking that with Trump that’s probably a positive.

Without having to worry about reelection, he would be free to be the bull in the China shop and clear out the swamp, undo everything Magoo did and end CDC authority to destroy the country and put a stake in the heart of the climate religion fraud. He could cancel subsidies for wind and solar, champion nuclear and make us energy independent again and to anyone who doesn’t like it turn around and show them the mistletoe hanging over his butt.

I have listened to Peter Navarro several times recently and he has destroyed Jared as a Rasputin like figure who constantly without official position undermined others to keep Trump from doing what he should have and it ultimately resulted in Trump losing and I believe it. Jared is and was only interested in making himself an outsized figure and don’t forget that both he and his wife are dyed in the wool Democrats and should have been kept away from the Trump administration. They hurt him and he was too loyal to family to stop it. He made a lot of bad personnel decisions due to his outsider status at the beginning of his administration and he won’t repeat them in a second term and because Jared has now written his work of fiction he will not be invited back. So I don’t understand why Levin is giving this mole a platform.

I have three children and I would not let any of them near my administration if I held elective office.

Apparently the case that excited Bongino was Judicial Watch against the National Archives and so put DOJ and the FBI and the Archives on the same side and makes my previous rant even more relevant.

A lot has been written recently about McConnell kind of sitting out the midterm and backhandedly criticizing low quality candidates – candidates endorsed by Trump that pulverized candidates endorsed by Mitch. So it occurred to me that what’s really going on is that Mitch would rather lose the senate and keep his minority leader position and continue to grift off he and his wife’s Chinese connections than win back the senate and get kicked to the curb. With the people he’s opposing along with significant number already in the senate I don’t see anyway this ultimate swamp creature RINO becomes majority leader.

There was some speculation today that Magoo may have reclassified what Trump declassified. Now that leads to some interesting questions.. Did Magoo do that before the raid or after if he in fact did it ? If before then that blows away his I know nothing mantra and also raises the question of whether a sitting president could do that? I don’t know that that has ever come up but I would have grave reservations about his ability to do that. I don’t see how Magoo could just decide to classify documents in my house or decide that everyone’s tax returns and supporting data are classified and must be surrendered to the feds. It will be a very interesting case.

Now if he did it after the raid then it would eliminate the charge that Trump took classified documents and they were searching for them and eliminate the bogus reasons for the raid.

Even more importantly, it has now become apparent that the real reason is that Trump had declassified and wanted to be made public all the information about Crossfire Hurricane and the Hillary emails. Which raises the question of whether it’s ethical or even legal for the FBI to get a warrant to coverup their illegal activities?

Getting more curious all the time. I’m pretty sure that team Magoo stupidly got way out over their skis and just thought they could get away with it because they always do, but they continue to underestimate things with Trump in the equation.

Once again he disappoints. Tonight on his Fox show he repeated his total nonsense about a case involving audio tapes in slick Willy’s sock drawer and beat on his chest about how he’s the only one covering it. Maybe that’s because everybody else with any legal background knows it’s meaningless. I ranted about it earlier this week and to make matters worse I even truthed it to him from my TruthSocial account to his. So he clearly knows that his scoop is nonsense.

But it gives me a chance to expand on my earlier rant. Remember Bongino was so proud of pointing out the fact that the district court opinion wasn’t appealed that I thought he might need a Kleenex at the end.

Now here’s what you need to know about this. Not only does it mean it’s non precedential but it indicates what was really going on. A very liberal Obama appointed judge wrote a very favorable opinion for Clinton and the DOJ and archives were in on it. So why wasn’t there an appeal? Because it could only hurt the left. If the opinion was upheld , then future Republican Presidents would have the same right to have carte blanche to do whatever they want with their records.

On the other hand, if it was overturned, the Clintons would have had a legal problem. It looks to me like the fix was in and there was no way an appeal would happen.

I am very disappointed in Bongino. I understand his incompetence at the beginning but for him to continue the charade is ridiculous. Sorry Dan you lost a lot of credibility by putting your ego first.

I don’t know how many of you know that pictures from the Webb space telescope have effectively disproven the Big Bang theory and scientists are scrambling to come up with a new theory that could replace what was dogma for decades, and btw god isn’t the answer because genesis doesn’t come close to explaining what’s now been discovered So I’m curious as to what the next theory will be.

Now the reason for this rant is to point out once again that theories are just that. If you can’t produce an E=mc2 or F=ma then you are just guessing! That includes all of global warming bullshit and economics. Listen back in my youth it was accepted science that matter could not be created or destroyed in a reaction and was even used throughout my chemical engineering studies where we used mass balance to solve problems. Basically whatever weight went into a process that same amount had to come out. It couldn’t disappear and that still holds true except for the caveat that nuclear reactions can actually create or destroy mass and that caveat was around even when I was in high school. Likewise back in the day it was considered dogma that atoms were made up of protons, neutrons and electrons and that was it. That’s as small as it could go. And now there are quarks and other stuff I don’t even pretend to know about.

So what’s my point? There is no such thing as settled science. Unless you actually have a proven equation you’re just guessing and we should all be skeptical.

As you know I don’t take prisoners. I have called out Rush and Sean and Tucker and Jesse and Bongino in the past and today Dan blew it again. It’s what happens when you get out over your skis on a subject that you don’t understand.

Today he was beyond ecstatic about a case cited in an article by john Solomon which I had scanned a day or two ago. In the article Solomon talked about a case involving the Archives trying to get audio tapes from Bill Clinton’s sock drawer under the Presidential Records Act and basically held that the president has the sole and unreviewable discretion to determine what was personal records and what were official records. Great!

But here’s where Dan went off the rails due his apparent ignorance of the judicial process and binding precedent. He kept gloating that the case wasn’t appealed which he apparently thought made it good precedent and the exact opposite is true.

An opinion by a US District court judge is not binding precedent on anyone, even other judges in the same district. Had it been appealed to the DC CIRCUIT COURT and upheld then it would be binding precedent that must be followed throughout the circuit.

So what you have here is the non binding opinion of one judge which is basically meaningless in the greater scheme of things. Bongino, don’t act the fool when you don’t know or understand what you are talking about!

After watching the squad complaining about having to repay their student loans, I believe that there should be a law preventing congressmen and senators from voting on legislation that personally benefits them period! You shouldn’t be able to vote for me to pay your bills!