I was very happy to see Jim Jordan say on Baier that they were looking at interference in a federal election. That’s a federal crime and trumps Bragg’s claim that he is interfering in a local criminal case. Now that it is again apparent that he filed charges that were barred by the statute of limitations, it’s clear that his only purpose was to interfere in the upcoming presidential election.

I have been saying for sometime that Fox is going left and is anti-Trump except for the evening programming which they can’t cancel because they make all the money for the network. Today the number one story for most of the day was that emails obtained under FOIA show what I told you at the time. Even Fox had it first until Bragg sued Jordan in federal court to get his subpoena cancelled. Magoo and the morons were behind and orchestrated the raid on Mar-a-lago and there were many indicating that they were actually looking for something other than the supposedly classified documents and that would explain the gross overreach including checking Melania’s panties.

I have absolutely no idea what Magoo thinks Trump has that’s dangerous to him. But my point is that the Five didn’t even cover the blockbuster story. Hopefully they were saving it for Tucker with his interview tonight with Trump.

Two things I learned today that make me want to correct previous rants. First it now appears that the statute of limitations actually has expired and Bragg filed phony charges knowing they were barred and thus confirming my take on why he did it. The New York rules of criminal procedure say that the statute can be tolled for two reasons. One which I previously talked about is that you basically hid out and prevented from having their bad actions discovered. The other is if the potential defendant was continuously out of the state. I will give you the link but Trump was not continuously out of New York for five straight years. He has a home there and visited frequently during that time period. Therefore the statute ran and expired.

https://thefederalist.com/2023/04/10/yes-the-statute-of-limitations-has-passed-on-braggs-get-trump-case/

The second thing I learned is that Trump and DeSantis can’t run on the same ticket unless they want to forfeit Florida’s 30 electoral votes. The person who said it actually got it wrong and said it would be unconstitutional but it’s not. They could run and just lose 30 electoral votes.

The other thing he said that the 11th amendment was the problem and I looked it up and it’s actually the 12th amendment and they could get around it if one of them was willing to move to a different state and that’s not going to happen. Trump isn’t leaving Mar A L and Ronnie isn’t giving up the governorship. It actually happened at least once when Dick Cheney moved from Texas back to Wyoming so he could be on the ticket with W.

Magoo and the morons are planning on putting out a rule change to Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that would change the meaning of sex, not gender which wasn’t in the Act, to be defined as gender identity to basically codify the right of men to compete in women’s sports. It’s absurd and inspite of all the nonsense being discussed now, the only way to end this leftist power grab and protect women is for the Supreme Court to decide the issue and they have a case coming to them that gives them the opportunity to restore reality. Unfortunately they passed on taking it on an expedited basis but it will still reach them on a normal track probably within a year or less. And there will be many more state suits before then if Magoo goes forward with his nonsense. Kristi Noem has already said South Dakota will sue.

Now any of you who have followed my nonsense from the beginning will know that I have previously discussed this issue. In point of fact SEX was added to the act as an attempt by a Dem senator or congressman to try to kill the bill because who would ever vote for equal rights for women? He’s now a celebrated as a civil rights icon.

In 1964 gender wasn’t a thing. Yes the word existed but the real term was sex and meant male or female or fornication but the latter was not part of the legislation. No senator or congressman even remotely thought they were voting on a law that would allow men to put on a wig and a skirt and be protected as a woman, and I guarantee you that they never intended Title IX to allow men to play women’s sports. The opposite is true. They wanted to make sure that women athletes had an opportunity for the same number of college scholarships as male athletes. (It’s not for this rant to deal with but this was wrong and I don’t think what they really wanted. Football pays for most other college sports and with male basketball surely does.)

So my point is that the Supremes have no choice but to reject Magoo’s nonsense. I’m sure that at least five of them will reject it and send it to congress to amend the act which they will never do.

And lastly will someone explain to me why the far left is so intent on disadvantaging real women?

Yesterday I told you about Andy McCarthy noticing something I didn’t — namely that all the charges of interfering in the 2016 election were for acts taken after the election. When I briefly perused the charges I was just looking to see if the charges were the same crap I expected and they were. Today he pointed out another thing that is not being reported. Trump was in the White House when he supposedly interfered in an election he had already won. Good point.

But there is something else that I have not seen anywhere else, and so you get to be the beneficiaries of my perspicacity. ( Look it up. It’s one of my favorite words and kudos to any of you who don’t to look it up.). The thing that I noticed was that the charges are based on Trump taking actions in 2017 that hid negative information from voters in 2016. Now here’s the point that occurred to me. The Stormy Daniels and Karen Mcdougal stories were front and center prior to the election. He’s being charged with hiding something that wasn’t!

Now the other thing I heard today and saw cases about is that the statute of limitations in New York is tolled for any period that Trump wasn’t physically in New York. So while all of this was going on, Trump was living in the White House or Florida. So there is no statute of limitations problem and I’m surprised that neither Andy nor Pirro mentioned it.

Watched his speech and he did what he needed to do. He didn’t attack DeSantis or anyone else except Magoo. He laid out all the legal issues facing him and destroyed them. It was perfect.

And I did. I read part of the indictment today and I missed what Andy McCarthy just said. All the counts begin with actions Trump took in 2017 months after the election and charge that he took actions to defraud voters months after they had already voted. An impossibility!

PS just in case you didn’t get it, you can’t claim that actions taken after an election influenced an election. NOT POSSIBLE! You already voted.

I didn’t go into detail about this problem earlier or try to list all the examples and fortunately VDH did. Enjoy.

There were two things that stood out in my mind today. First it was great to see HFJ back and Tarlov gone. However he blew his first point. He said there is no two tiered justice system in the US. Everybody has the same right to due process and appeals etc. That’s nice but not what the issue is. The two tiered justice system refers to the fact that if you’re a Dem or leftist you don’t get charged at all and so due process considerations are irrelevant. If you’re a Clinton or Biden you’re safe. If you’re a Trump spitting on the sidewalk is a felony.

The second thing that amazed me is how they all yucked it up about the brutal tackle of a guy proposing on a ball field. I believe you’d be hard pressed to find a better illustration of what the use of excess force is.

Was just watching back Gutfeld from last night and they had a segment about the male weightlifter from Canada who identified as a female to enter a competition and set the record by 100 pounds to prove the point that men shouldn’t be allowed to compete as women. And during the segment Tyrus suggested that a male swimmer should enter a meet against Lia Thomas but he didn’t carry it out to the end, so I will. Wouldn’t it be great if Michael Phelps entered the Olympic trials as a woman. Do you think fake woman Thomas would compete so he/she could be embarrassed? I don’t think so!

And just to make it clear that Lia is a joke Ryan Lochte and even Mark Spitz and Cullen Jones should come out of retirement to guarantee the Lia will not qualify and be embarrassed. And for those of you who don’t know who Cullen Jones is, he was a black male swimmer at NC State at the same time my son was on the diving team and that guy was a nice gentleman and faster than shit through a goose and he’s an Olympic gold medalist.