I was listening to them for a while today and their later segment on the Iowa caucuses was just plain stupid. They apparently think that Ronnie DS has a great chance to win in Iowa because Cruz beat Trump there in 2016 when Cruz was only polling at 2%. It is so stupid that it requires response. In 2016 Trump wasn’t really a mainstay in Iowa. However during his first term he favored the farmers in Iowa and the nations breadbasket with billions of dollars by putting tariffs on China and giving most of that money back to the farmers. Head to head how do you think RDS will do when Trump touts what he did for them and RDS hasn’t done anything for them? It amazes me how often the supposed geniuses can’t recall the past.

My apologies because I thought he would do his job and I was wrong, but he thought he did his job to protect DOJ. He told us what we’ve known for years and didn’t even try to indict the big crooks. Jesse said he did report on things we didn’t know about ditching Hillary investigations but I’m pretty sure I ranted about that six or seven years ago and I agree with Pirro that it’s all talk and no action. I should have recognized that the outcome would be pablum protecting the swamp because he was chosen by the ultimate swamp rat Barr.

I heard Clay and Buck talking about maybe there should be a limit on the age for a president put in the constitution instead of a minimum age. It’s utter nonsense.and their position is that because of Feinstein and Magoo it should be obvious. Really? Feinstein is clearly incompetent and looks like she had a stroke and not shingles. And Magoo is clearly mentally disabled. However Chuck Grassley is 89, the same age as Feinstein and he is clearly mentally cogent . So stop the nonsense. Age is not the issue. It’s mental activity. Shrek is in his forties and doesn’t know what he’s doing in any given day. He’s basically a vegetable!

So let’s stop talking about age. Let’s start talking about mental acuity!

Trump got CNN 3.5 million viewers. They usually have less than 500K I think. So just like I said about Tucker, his viewers will follow wherever he goes. It could be a small platform now but it will be Tucker level when he gets there.

I’m not going to say a lot about the Comer presser this morning. I watched it all and I’m sure many of you did also and if you didn’t you can see it or read it anywhere. But here’s the most interesting thing that was pointed out today and that is that there is no Magoo family business. They don’t own shopping malls or hotel chains or anything else. Their only business is influence peddling.

So what services did the grandkids perform for the money they got from foreign governments or the siblings etc? Pirro did an excellent job of explaining how criminal enterprises work and the Magoo mafia is clearly one. Tarlov’s lonely brain cell embarrassed itself again. Her standard is that Magoo’s innocent if you can’t show a direct deposit from a foreign government into Magoo’s bank account. Now here’s the question nobody asked. Where did all Magoo’s money come from? He’s worth millions and has never had a real job? I’m guessing some of the graft made it’s way into his account after a thorough laundering.

Yesterday I questioned how the jury could unanimously find that Trump did not rape Carroll and then unanimously find that he defamed her when he denied that he raped her and quite frankly I still have no idea how the hell they got to that amount. It is baffling.

There are two links below and I would encourage you to read both. The first is an eye opener because it suggests that the supposed non rape could by the judges instructions could have been a peck on the cheek or a pat on the ass that she later she decided was offensive.

In second is Dershowitz explaining all the problems with the verdict.

https://pingthread.com/thread/1656094433685786624

I am just watching Gutfeld from last night and he covered the same fat belly small dick story I did yesterday!

One of you thinks that today’s verdict dooms Trump. I beg to differ. Is there any of you who read this nonsense who just decided to vote for Magoo? Of course not. Everyone knows what’s going on and we’re not being fooled.

As you know a totally biased jury found Trump guilty of sexual battery but not rape and then went on to award $5 million in damages. I haven’t seen the breakdown on damages but have to believe it was mostly punitive damages because I don’t see how a woman who was not raped, according to the jury, but maybe touched without her consent suffered that amount of damages. It couldn’t be that traumatic since she claimed to have been raped by most everyone in the city. She has an AOC complex. And she was way less credible than Ballsy Ford.

I am familiar with lesser included charges in criminal cases but have never heard of them in civil cases. That doesn’t necessarily mean anything because civil tort trials are not what I did, but I spent a little time trying to find out about lesser included charges in civil cases and every search came back dealing with criminal cases.

In criminal cases you have things like first degree murder requiring premeditation but maybe the jury finds it wasn’t premeditated but spur of the moment or unintentional but reckless. The judge can charge the jury if requested that if they don’t find premeditation, they could find 2nd degree murder or manslaughter depending on what they decide.

Like I said, I have never heard of it, but it must be a thing because otherwise the judge couldn’t have done it. No judge wants to make up law in a high profile Trump case.

But that brings me to my last point until more is known, and that is how could the jury find that Trump didn’t rape her but conclude that he defamed her by denying he raped her? If you can figure that out, let me know

I saw today that a judge dismissed a case against a transgender woman for exposure in a woman’s locker room because the dude was so fat that the judge said his stomach would hang over and cover his dick so the ladies couldn’t possibly see it