I just watched Trump being interviewed by Bolling and he was as usual great. But the one thing he said was that he would not sign the RNC required pledge to support whoever gets the republican nomination. And he shouldn’t! Why would he ever support an idiot like Christie? I am sure that Christie would never support him and I don’t know if Christie has signed that pledge and so his fat ass may not be on the stage anyway. As I’m aware the only two people who have actually checked the all the boxes to be on the debate stage are RDS and Ramaswamy.

Trump is the Republican Party and they need to understand that. He doesn’t need them they need him.

Although he declined to definitively say whether or not he will participate, his firm declaration that he would not sign the pledge tells you all you need to know.

I think that it’s possible that the RNC will change its mind on the pledge because if they don’t it will be a very small debate and both the RNC and Fox will be embarrassed.

I was listening to him today and he once again used his SS expertise to enlighten us all on the fact that the SS under the law can say that Trump will not be put in a prison and no one, judge, jury warden or anyone else could interfere with their decision without committing a felony! I was driving so couldn’t write down the criminal statute cites but Bongino knows what he is talking about in this area.

These people keep demonstrating that they have no clue what they are talking about when it comes to televising the Trump J6 trial.

HFJ apparently thinks justice should be hidden from us mere mortals.

The blonde munchkin thinks it would be a mistake to allow cameras into a courtroom in spite of the fact that it did not affect the OJ trial or the Kenosha trial and literally hundreds of other televised trials. Dana’s evidence was look what happened when White House briefings were televised and Jim Acosta acted the fool. Guess what munchkin, if Acosta did that in a courtroom his ass would be in jail and fined and could lose his license. Judges don’t have to put up with shit and they don’t.

Jesse had maybe the stupidest solution. He suggested that they should do like the Supreme Court and allow audio only. Guess what moron, oral arguments in the Supreme Court are just that. Lawyers argue their case and respond orally to questions from the justices. In a trial court there are exhibits and documents and charts and videos that would be lost in audio only.

The other thing that they seem to miss is that if it’s not televised than all the low knowledge voters will only get what the deranged msm tells them happened. If it’s all on live many might watch and make it much harder for the left to pretend what happened didn’t.

I received the text printed below and it perfectly encapsulates the big brother big tech we live. I don’t know where she got it from but it is so true. Enjoy!

The future is here.

A man calls Pizza hut to order a pizza…
CALLER: Is this Pizza Hut?
GOOGLE: No sir, it’s Google Pizza.
CALLER: I must have dialed a wrong number, sorry.
GOOGLE: No sir, Google bought Pizza Hut last month.
CALLER: OK. I would like to order a pizza.
GOOGLE: Do you want your usual, sir?
CALLER: My usual? You know me?
GOOGLE: According to our caller ID data sheet, the last 12 times you called you ordered an extra-large pizza with three cheeses, sausage, pepperoni, mushrooms and meatballs on a thick crust.
CALLER: Super! That’s what I’ll have.
GOOGLE: May I suggest that this time you order a pizza with ricotta, arugula, sun-dried tomatoes and olives on a whole wheat gluten-free thin crust?
CALLER: What? I don’t want a vegetarian pizza!
GOOGLE: Your cholesterol is not good, sir.
CALLER: How the hell do you know that?
GOOGLE: Well, we cross-referenced your home phone number with your medical records. We have the result of your blood tests for the last 7 years.
CALLER: Okay, but I do not want your rotten vegetarian pizza! I already take medication for my cholesterol.
GOOGLE: Excuse me sir, but you have not taken your medication regularly. According to our database, you purchased only a box of 30 cholesterol tablets once at Lloyds Pharmacy, 4 months ago.
CALLER: I bought more from another Pharmacy.
GOOGLE: That doesn’t show on your credit card statement.
CALLER: I paid in cash.
GOOGLE: But you did not withdraw enough cash according to your bank statement.
CALLER: I have other sources of cash.
GOOGLE: That doesn’t show on your latest tax returns unless you bought them using an undeclared income source, which is against the law!
CALLER: WHAT THE HELL!
GOOGLE: I’m sorry sir, we use such information only with the sole intention of helping you.
CALLER: Enough already! I’m sick to death of Google, Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp and all the others. I’m going to an island without the internet, TV, where there is no phone service and no one to watch me or spy on me

GOOGLE: I understand sir, but you need to renew your passport first. It expired 6 weeks ago.

Unfortunately so very true.

I just watched it and it was as always entertaining. He stuck to what he should and was riveting. The one thing he said that was new to me was that he would abolish the Department of Education and I could agree with that totally. The federal government has no right to interfere with the education, or in their case the indoctrination l, of our children. This is a function of our states. Let them determine what should be taught and then if you disagree move to a state that gets it right. Cut the federal budget by the amount of money allocated to the DOE and give it back to the states per capita by the number of students.

Today this moron and 68 of his Dem colleagues came out demanding that the Trump J6 trial be put live on TV. And I agree which means one of us is an idiot and I’m pretty sure it’s not me. So let me explain.

I thought he had been a US Attorney in Southern California before he became a congressman man and must have forgotten what a real trial is like. I was wrong. I looked it up and he went to Stanford undergrad and then to Harvard law, which as you know from following me, in the words of Shania Twain — that don’t impress me much. In point of fact he was an Assistant USA in Southern California for a year or so in around 1990 before running for office in the California Legislature and then ultimately in Congress. And he’s now running to replace brain dead Feinstein and I would actually prefer Feinstein. She would do less harm to the country.

Okay so what’s my point? Schitt is either a complete idiot or forgot everything he ever knew about real criminal trials. They are not grand jury proceedings where only the prosecution puts forward its case with no input from the defense on either the facts or the bogus law of Smith.

More importantly they are not Hollywood produced mockumentaries where you put on your side, deceptingly edit video and allow no response from the other side.

In a criminal trial, when Smith puts up his bs witnesses, Trump’s attorneys get to destroy them on cross examination and the Trump team has indicated that they intend to methodically eviscerate the fraud in the 2020 election. Hooray! I put up just a modicum of potential cross yesterday and could easily write at least a novella more. And no don’t ask because I’m not going to do it unless Trump wants to pay me what he’s paying his attorneys which have so far been a disappointment to me.

Now the other thing that makes me want to have the trial broadcast is something that they danced around and didn’t understand on the Five today. A live broadcast would curtail the judge from acting the fool and this judge is just that. But even she will not want the world to see her as a partisan hack.

I was going to rant about this but originally decided not to because the sheriff in Atlanta said he would take Trump’s mugshot and finger print him. I originally didn’t rant because they covered it on the Five. But I decided to because Gutfeld said a t shirt with the mugshot on it would be a bestseller and I’m sure that’s true but I believe that as I told one of you before Trump’s first arraignment, the real best seller would be a mugshot mug. I would certainly buy one and am willing to bet that Trump already has set up the machinery in place to turn out production as soon as the mugshot is taken. It would be a huge fundraising coup.

One other thing that I’ll mention is that since most of you are in my age group, fingerprinting is not what it used to be. During the course of my government career I was fingerprinted several times as a matter of course and it involved putting your fingers on an ink pad and then having an official roll them on a paper pad.

That’s not what is done anymore. When I went in to get my gun permit, that’s not what’s done anymore. You put your fingers on something like an iPad and that’s it.

Actually it was before the Bragg arraignment in New York

I meant to do this earlier but I’m doing it now. The cackler keeps saying that Florida’s curriculum on slavery should be based on the stories of descendants of actual slaves. In point of fact, that’s exactly what it is. The funny thing is that this screed is coming from the descendant of a family who owned slaves. Please someone call her out. She has no basis for her nonsense. She has the perspective of an overseer!

Contrary to my normal laziness, I actually downloaded the indictment and read much of it until my intolerance for bullshit reached its limit. Now before I go any further, I want to explain why there was no count about the actual J6 riots or insurrection as the left would have it. As I reminded one of you yesterday, not long after that day the then Magoo DOJ came out with a report clearly stating that Trump wasn’t responsible for the riots. Even in DC you would be hard pressed to convince a jury that Trump was guilty when your own agency said otherwise.

Now I’m not going to rehash how bad the indictment is. Any of you who read this have heard numerous legal experts like Turley and McCarthy and Dershowitz and others obliterate this ridiculous indictment. So what I am going to do is deal with the one main issue that is at the heart of this travesty. Namely that Trump knew he lost and still spewed the falsity that the election was stolen.

Apparently, Jack Smith hasn’t kept up with the news. So let me enlighten him. The indictment actually cites the ballot fraud in Atlanta which I have previously discussed but will again. In the indictment it cites the ass covering Georgia officials who said nothing to see here. The video was taken out of context because it was just a 90 second clip. I have no idea what they are talking about because I watched more than 90 seconds and there is no getting around the obvious. First there were no observers in the room when they pulled out the suitcases and started counting contrary to Georgia law. And there is no way to ignore that on the video one woman put a group of ballots through the machine and then pulled them out and put them through the machine two more times. I would love to see Smith try to explain that or better yet have the scumbag Raffensperger have to explain under cross examination how these obvious violations of Georgia law are standard practice. He would devolve into the pile of dog shit that he is.

And staying with this degenerate, the indictment also says Trump knew the Dominion voting machines in Georgia were not capable of manipulation. If you’ve been following you know that a few weeks ago I put up articles proving that the machines could change votes and the idiot Raffensperger hid it for two years and then said he wouldn’t put in the patches to get rid of the vulnerabilities until after 2024.

Now I could go on but just remember at least two swing state supreme courts have declared that the changes made to voting by courts and secretaries of state and election officials were unconstitutional and that the 2020 results invalid.

The last thing I will comment on is my observation of the similar problem between Bragg and Smith. Both are alleging that Trump took actions after the election to interfere with citizens right to vote. A nonstarter. In both cases voters had already voted and had their ballots counted. Now Smith is a little different because he’s alleging that Trump was trying to prevent the already counted votes from counting? You are not disenfranchised if you voted multiple times, you are not being disenfranchised if only one of them counts and you are not being disenfranchised by Trump if your state and local officials illegally changed rules and maybe not your fault if your vote doesn’t count. Blame them not Trump.

One thing that occurred to me is that the reason Trump was successful in 2016 and is way ahead now is because he rejected all the supposedly brilliant ‘conservative’ campaign pundits. It’s also why they hate him. He cut off their self entitled grift. That just drove them crazy not being able to eat from the trough.

It’s also why Vivek Ramaswamy is going to pass RDS shortly. He’s running his own campaign and is not part of the swamp and is not cowtowing to the perpetual loser pundits. Like Trump he is a political outsider who has actually successfully accomplished things in the real world.

Which brings me to RDS. He should have done better, but unfortunately he hired a bunch of these leeches and all he got for it was a massive drain on campaign funds and all he got was the usual losing ideas which resulted in him dropping precipitously in the polls. He has apparently booted many of them and it remains to be seen whether he can recover. It’s historically unlikely but time will tell.