I am not going to detail all the nonsense that went into the verdict. Instead I’m going to explain how I knew what the verdict would be as soon as it was announced that a verdict had been reached.

First there was never going to be a not guilty verdict given the makeup of the jury. And then there was no way it could have been a hung jury. The reason for this observation is because the judge did not enter the Allen charge.

What is that? When the jury indicates to the judge that they can’t reach a verdict, and that didn’t happen here, the judge usually gives an instruction that basically says you have a duty as a jury to reach a verdict. If you don’t you’re not doing your duty so go back and reach a unanimous verdict. That didn’t happen and this judge would have certainly have given the Allen charge. Since that didn’t happen guilty was the only option.

What I haven’t mentioned about 18 USC 242 but should have is that it requires that the offending party knew what the constitutional right was and knowingly violated it. Can a judge and multiple prosecutors claim they don’t know constitutional law? NO! Unless they quit their jobs.

First I would like to see Trump do this in his debate with Magoo but that would only give the left the ability to scream that Trump will be a dictator that only wants to crush his enemies.

So what I want to see happen is for a neutral expert like Turley or Dershowitz to come out before the verdict and remind Magoo before he gloats that the statute of limitations has not run on his criminal activities with respect to his illegal possession of classified documents and could easily prosecuted for it after Trump is in office and as I have said previously, it doesn’t have to be in DC. And in my dreams they would also mention that Merchan and Bragg and Fani and the whole cabal are subject to criminal prosecution under 18 USC 242.

J.D. Vance yesterday sent a letter to Garland asking him to investigate Merchan under 18 USC 242 for unconstitutionally gagging Trump in violation of the first amendment.

Once again I am tired of the Republicans pretending they are above the fray. The only thing Dems understand is when they suffer. Make them suffer! Your base will love you for it and screw the bs from the left. Ignore them and do what’s right.

I am sick and tired of Hollywood morons ranting nonsense with no evidence to support their nonsense and de Niro is the retarded mental midget leader of the pack. Now in case you don’t know, he didn’t even graduate from high school making him one of the people who Ricky Gervais referred to in his rant at the Golden Globes (I think) as having spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg. His whole life has been reading what other people wrote. Even in his nonsense today, he was reading a script and not very well.

And if to prove he’s a total retard, and yes I said it and it’s a good word and I refuse to abandon it for woke bullshit, I noticed when he got out of his car today that he was wearing a mask! None of his 8 or so bodyguards were. I noticed it immediately but it was mentioned by one person on the Five and since then no one else. He took it off before he got to the podium but it still demonstrates that he’s a retarded moron. No one who has a brain believes, after all the scientific studies to the contrary, that masks are effective against Covid. He’s the definition of a tin foil hat idiot and should go quietly into the dark.

PS I would never use it in referring to a person who was actually mentally handicapped.

Just heard from Dershowitz that in New York in closing arguments the defense goes first. That’s absurd. As I have said previously the normal way is that the prosecution goes first followed by the defense and then the prosecution gets a rebuttal. Requiring the defense to go first means they have to respond to what they haven’t heard. Total nonsense but at least it’s not unique to this case. However given that the prosecution hadn’t ever specified the crime that Trump was suspected to have committed, it makes it very difficult to deliver an effective defense.

Why do I say this? Because of their actions not their words. They keep insisting that the polls are wrong and complain that we just don’t understand how much Magoo has done for us. But their actions tell a different story. They are trying to rush through many regulations that no one wants mostly under the guise of climate change. They are putting in regulations to make it harder to fire political rats they are burrowing into the swamp. And in the biggest tell of all, Magoo is planning to sign an agreement that would turn over our sovereignty to the will of the WHO — a Chinese controlled entity. The good news is that it won’t be a treaty because it would never be ratified by the senate. So just like the Paris climate nonsense, Trump could withdraw on day one.

But there is no reason that they would be trying to rush things through, in many instances contrary to required procedures and laws unless they were really concerned that they only have a few months left.

I should have put this up recently. I’m pretty sure that I have discussed it a while ago.

For those who like me who want to see all the Dem cronies who have targeted Trump with their lawfare locked up, below is a statute that allows for that and is applicable to all government employees at all levels including cops, prosecutors and JUDGES! That’s right, Merchan could find his pompous, obnoxious ass in an orange jumpsuit!

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242

I haven’t mentioned this before and it has rarely been mentioned in the media but Judge Merchan was handpicked for this case. The normal process for assigning a judge to a case is from drawing a name out of a hat or something equivalent but in this case, contrary to standard practice, the chief judge specifically assigned Merchan to the case in spite of his obvious conflicts. The fix has been in from the beginning.

The link below will explain and indicates that the CDC had a report that was only recently released containing the above statistics.

Yesterday I heard Hannity on his radio program and he said two things that were contradictory in a very short period of time. First he said in response to a caller that he didn’t want to see our judicial system turn into a tit for tat with a Trump DOJ going after Magoo et al like they went after him. He believes that this would turn us into a banana republic. Apparently he believes that DOJ is some independent arbiter of justice removed from the executive branch. Total nonsense as I have said many times they are an executive department under the president — not independent!

Hannity’s position is one I have ranted against repeatedly. The republicans need to grow a pair and quit pretending they are above politics. All that does is give the Dems carte blanche to run over them without fear of retribution. The only way to level the playing field is to put some of their biggest members in jail and don’t worry about the faux outrage from the left. Do you want to continue to be graceful losers or start winning? Trump should have locked up Hillary and Comey and company and I’m tired of the bogus nonsense that you can’t convict them in DC. In most cases they committed some of their crimes outside of DC and could be tried there. Hillary’s bathtub server was located in Chappaquiddick, New York and the case could have been brought there and even if other venues are not available indict them anyway and bleed them financially dry like they have done to republicans.

Now part two of this rant is that five or ten minutes later in response to another caller he said he would like to see Magoo and Garland and Bragg and Smith and Fani sitting on the side of the table that Trump now occupies. For that to happen, what he just said he didn’t want to see would have to happen. So which is it? Make up your mind. You can’t have it both ways Pollyanna!