The last point I made is the most important point. Trump needs to understand that he has an opportunity to actually be heard by people who have never heard him or the truth about Magoo. He doesn’t need to pander to his base. They’re his and nothing he’s going to say will change that. But he will be addressing for the first time people who only know bs from the leftist msm bubble and don’t know anything else. They were indoctrinated in school and only tune into leftist propaganda. Use your opportunity to reach them and maybe cause them to rethink the bs they’ve been fed.

I was going to wax eloquently about what Trump should do but it’s pretty much already been covered by everybody. It’s important that he not take the bait which the moderators will throw at him and throw it back to the issues that are important to voters like inflation and crime and the border and when Magoo tries to play down inflation point out that even with his counting is continued to grow and the basket of goods and services that they base official numbers on doesn’t include gas and groceries.

Likewise when Magoo claims that he created 15 million jobs, point out that people you forced out of their jobs because of phony nonsense from Fauci and him. These people returning to their jobs aren’t being created by you. The only jobs he’s created are 88,000 new IRS agents to harass middle and lower income families. The rich are already being audited every year.

When they bring up J6 continuously, Trump needs to say that is not what the voters are interested in. I never encouraged anyone to storm the Capitol and now video shot by her daughter has Pelosi admitting in real time that the breach was her fault. It was supposedly an insurrection of unarmed people — unheard of ever before. And the only person killed was an unarmed veteran who was shot by a rogue cop who you covered for and who has been promoted and I promise you that when I’m elected my DOJ will conduct an honest investigation and if he committed murder he will be prosecuted.

I also hope that he throws back at the moderators that they ask Magoo what he has say about his reason for running in 2020 that he has claimed that Trump said there were good Nazis and white supremacists. It has been proven false from the beginning but Magoo continues to spout it. Will he apologize now that even Snopes has admitted that it false.

And push to have Magoo admit that the laptop is real and his campaign ginned up the bogus letter from 51 unintelligent individuals to cover for him during our last debate. You stood there and bald faced lied to the American people.

The other thing I want Trump to do is to throw the whole race thing in Magoo’s face because it’s important because many who will be watching have never been told that it was the Dems including Magoo that were the party of segregation and Jim Crow and opposed the civil rights act and the voting rights act and Magoo with his mentor Robert Byrd, the grand cyclops of the KKK, and he fought against busing because he didn’t want his kids to go to school in a racial jungle. He championed a crime bill back in the 90’s that effectively incarcerated an entire generation of black men.

The photo of crying Chuck Schumer trying to grill a cheeseburger got a lot of criticism this past week but for the wrong reason. All the talking heads on Fox shamed him for putting cheese on a raw burger claiming that it is not done. Now I knew you didn’t do what Chuck did maybe from watching my dad or maybe intuitively but something was nagging me about it. Then I realized that what they said was bullshit. I get hamburger patties from the grocery store that have bacon and cheddar cheese in the raw patties. You put cheese on top of hamburger or other meats before you bake a pizza and I’m sure you could come up with countless other examples. So what was Schumer’s real problem? Explain how this idiot was going to flip the burger.

Here’s a link to the video.

https://en.as.com/videos/president-biden-struggles-with-suv-entry-raising-questions-about-his-health-again-v/

I hope you have seen the video of Magoo trying to get in a car. It’s painful to watch. He has trouble even lifting his leg to get in the car and it takes him forever. It is the most damning video I’ve seen. You may never have seen it because the only place I have seen it is on Hannity. I’m sure it’s somewhere on the internet.

I put up the link below. It’s not long but indicates that many of the changes people familiar with the industry have been advocating for for decades are included. The one new thing that I found most interesting is that NRC would be required to rewrite its mission statement to include not only protecting the public from the potential adverse effects of nuclear energy but also to protect the public from the adverse effects of not using nuclear power.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/congress-just-passed-the-biggest-clean-energy-bill-since-bidens-climate-law/ar-BB1ot3bx

This is just a small preview of what I will put up next week on the debate. But I would like to see not only the candidates muted when the other is responding but I want the biased moderators to also be muted. Ask the question and then shut the hell up. You’re not a candidate and let the people hear what the actual candidates have to say. If you want to participate then give up your mike and take a podium where they can be challenged.

There are two things this week that beg comment. First Magoo’s non-performance at the Juneteenth event which by the way is still not here. Am I the only one who thought he looked like a cardboard cutout? Really watch it again. Everyone is‘dancing’ except Magoo and he really looks like a cutout.

Next the nonsense from Canada replacing cervix with front hole. First the front hole is the vagina!. The cervix is located inside the vagina and apparently can result in pain for the woman if her partner’s Johnson is too long. I’ve only read about this. It’s never been a personal problem.

I’m sure you’ve all heard about the $8 billion or so I don’t remember it could be more for charging stations for EV’s resulting in 8 charging stations. WOW! But I don’t know if you saw today but they also had billions to provide high speed affordable internet to fly over states and as came out today, if I remember correctly, they have provided zero so far. Now to be charitable, if you remember when Magoo put Kamala in charge of this project, I said that these people better get used to tin cans and string because that’s all they’re going to get. She’s clueless!

There were two court cases today that continue to eat away at the Chevron doctrine, which if you forgot comes from a Supreme Court case that essentially ruled that courts have to defer to decisions of administrative agencies when interpreting enabling statutes.

The first is a Supreme Court decision authored by Justice Thomas on the rule prohibiting bump stocks. It’s not surprising that he would author this opinion because as I have previously stated he is the leading voice calling for the repeal of Chevron. Now what are bump stocks? They are a device when used with a semiautomatic weapon makes it a faster semiautomatic weapon, but as Thomas points out it’s still a semiautomatic weapon. Thomas points out that machine guns have long been illegal and the difference which I discussed previously is that machine guns and all automatic weapons fire continuously as long as you hold the trigger down. Semiautomatic weapons automatically chamber the next bullet after you pull the trigger but require you to pull the trigger to fire every time. Thomas correctly noted that the ATF exceeded its authority by declaring bump stock weapons as automatic weapons because as I just explained they are not automatic weapons. You still have to pull the trigger individually for each shot. Apparently it allows you to do it quicker but you still have to do it and therefore it’s not automatic and the ATF exceeded its authority.

For a brief history of how this all came about check out the paragraphs printed below. I wanted to just post the link but apparently Forbes wouldn’t let me. I’m pretty sure that you will be reminded that this was Trump’s ATF not Magoo’s.

wkSign InFORBESBUSINESSBREAKING

Bump Stocks: What To Know About Controversy Over Gun Devices As Supreme Court Drops Ban

Alison DurkeeForbes StaffAlison is a senior news reporter covering US politics and legal news.Follow1Jun 14, 2024,01:15pm EDT

TOPLINE

The Supreme Court struck down a Trump-era ban on “bump stocks” for guns on Friday—devices that allow a semi-automatic rifle to fire shots rapidly, mimicking a machine gun—reviving a years-old controversy over the devices after they first came under scrutiny following the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting.

TIMELINE

June 7, 2010In a letter to bump stock manufacturer Slide Fire Solutions, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) confirms it’s evaluated the company’s bump stocks and determined they are regulated as a firearm part, not a machine gun—which would make them illegal under federal law.

October 1, 2017A gunman opens fire at the Route 91 Harvest Festival in Las Vegas using a firearm equipped with a bump stock, killing 60 people and injuring more than 400—the deadliest shooting in modern U.S. history.

October 5, 2017Amid calls from lawmakers to regulate the devices—including some Republicans—the National Rifle Association issues a statement saying it believes bump stocks “should be subject to additional regulations” (it has since backed overturning the ban).

October 10, 2017A bipartisan group of lawmakers introducelegislation to ban the devices, but a day later, then-House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., urges the government to restrict bump stocks using regulations instead.

December 26, 2017The ATF publishes a proposed rule that would reclassify bump stocks as machine guns, which would ban them under federal law.https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/anchor?ar=1&k=6LeLC2wpAAAAAHxdEQ59hxseRouCtGrCo22PUjuu&co=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZm9yYmVzLmNvbTo0NDM.&hl=en&v=TqxSU0dsOd2Q9IbI7CpFnJLD&size=invisible&cb=7bflnbkrxwez

Forbes Daily: Join over 1 million Forbes Daily subscribers and get our best stories, exclusive reporting and essential analysis of the day’s news in your inbox every weekday.Sign UpBy signing up, you agree to receive this newsletter, other updates about Forbes and its affiliates’ offerings, our Terms of Service(including resolving disputes on an individual basis via arbitration), and you acknowledge our Privacy Statement. Forbes is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Serviceapply.

February 20, 2018Then-President Donald Trump issues a memorandum calling on the Justice Department to “dedicate all available resources” to reviewing comments on the proposed rule and coming up with a final proposal to ban bump stocks.

December 18, 2018The Justice Department announces its final rule banning bump stocks through the ATF, saying it’s “faithfully following President Trump’s leadership by making clear that bump stocks, which turn semiautomatics into machine guns, are illegal.”

March 26, 2019The final rule banning bump stocks takes effect, with all bump stock owners having to either destroy their bump stocks by that date or turn them into the ATF—and gun owner Michael Cargill immediately files a federal lawsuit challenging the ban.

November 23, 2020A federal district judge rules against Cargill.

January 6, 2023A federal appeals court strikes down the bump stock ban, after several other appeals court rulings upheld it—leading the dispute to make its way to the Supreme Court.

June 14, 2024The Supreme Court rules 6-3 that the ATF exceeded its authority when it banned bump stocks, striking down the federal rule.

Now the second case was out of a federal district court in Louisiana and it enjoined the enforcement of Magoo’s attempt to bastardize Tile IX by declaring gender as stated in the statute included gender identity. The judge correctly pointed out that when Title IX was passed, gender only meant male or female. And if you look up anything about the case you will see the judge wasn’t kind in his take down of the brazen attempt to rewrite the statute by executive fiat.

Now as I’m sure you can guess the left lost its mind declaring that the change was necessary to protect transgender rights. There are two things that you can take away from this. First the left knows that they are impermissibly administratively rewriting statutes and second they know they can’t get their nonsense through Congress so they go hair on fire crazy every time they get caught subverting the law.