It occurred to me that there is something that is missing from the public discourse but is not missing on this blog. Namely that the lawyers who continuously criticize SK’s word salads and inability to respond to questions never connect that to her ability as a litigator. I have never heard Turley or Ingraham or Dershowitz or Pirro etc. ever connect the dots and criticize her prosecutorial bona fides. I know that Pirro and a few others have questioned whether or not she actually tried any cases, but they have never once connected that to her lack of abilities necessary to be a successful litigator. It’s obvious but none of them ever do it.

They don’t even point out obvious lies. I don’t have contacts or sources other than what’s in the public domain, but I manage to see things that should be pointed out. For example SK keeps talking about prosecuting transnational cartels. In either her debate with Trump or one of her other interviews she said she prosecuted the Sinaloa cartel and the Guadalajaran cartel. Problem — the Guadalajaran cartel disbanded a year before she ever became a junior prosecutor! Nobody does their homework and points out her obvious lies.

It’s like Tampon Tim claiming he was at Tianemen Square and then claiming well he was there sometime later that summer and got his dates wrong.People if you were there when the tanks rolled over the protesters, you wouldn’t forget it. He wasn’t and he clearly knows it. It would be like someone claiming they were in the Good Friday earthquake when they weren’t. Believe me if you were there you would know it.