So I said that I agreed with Dershowitz on whether the warrant should have been granted because of the allegations that the highest levels of classified information was in the mansion, but what I forgot about was that the warrant basically was what’s known as a general warrant which is unconstitutional. One of the things that our founders wanted to prohibit was the use of a general warrant to allow the king’s people to just get a warrant to allow them without specificity of what the supposed crime was and what they were looking for and just ransack your house to see if they could find some reason to charge you and that’s why they put in the fourth amendment that warrants could only be issued naming the potential crimes and specifically specifying what exactly they are seeking. In Trump’s case they sought any documents that might have been created during his administration and that is the definition of an unconstitutional general warrant.

My bad. And Dershowitz should know better.