First the FBI and DOJ are issuing warnings on all kinds of stuff including dirty bombs. Don’t believe a word of it. It is all a false flag operation like J6 and the Whitmer ‘kidnapping’ designed to try to foment something like J6 so they can Institute marshal law and turn us into a police state now with 87,000 more armed IRS agents who are willing to kill citizens. It’s in the job description!

I don’t know if this is because their raid backfired or the raid itself was designed to foment some reaction that would give them an excuse to crack down. In either event, don’t take the bait. Keep your powder dry and vote them out in November and then impeach Garland and Wray.

The second thing is that there is some confusing stuff about the feds subpoenaing the Trump security surveillance tapes. Apparently they subpoenaed 60 or 61 days worth but it’s not clear whether that covered their misconduct during the raid. It appears that they supposedly saw video of boxes being moved in and out of the storage space after their June review of the property. So this is where I get lost. If they saw video of that then they already have the videos and potentially used it in the affadavit to get the warrant or have illegally breached his system. Either way, the video of their misdeeds wasn’t covered by the warrant. By definition they couldn’t be because you can’t get a warrant to search for something that doesn’t exist at the time of the warrant.

So I’m totally unclear whether the subpoena covers the 60 days before the raid or has been issued subsequent to the raid to try to cover their asses. The good news is that unlike a warrant which they just show up with and execute, you can move to quash a subpoena and if you’re dealing with the same biased magistrate you can appeal all the way up and I don’t believe you would have to go too high up to get it quashed at least with respect to what happened during the raid. I can’t imagine the justification for that when normal operating procedure is that the person and/or his counsel can observe. I don’t believe that you can convince any remotely competent non biased judicial officer that you have the right to hide what you’re doing.

Let’s see what really happened.