You maybe wondering about my position that SK doesn’t have the mental horsepower to actually process information and respond on the fly. I was right. The difference between her and Magoo is that he tried to and she didn’t. All her responses were either he’s lying or some canned talking point that had nothing to do with the issue. Trump should have made her pay for it but he didn’t. Bad on him but it doesn’t demonstrate that she can think on her feet.

Now SK and the presstitutes are demanding another debate and saying that Trump is afraid to do it. Trump should accept but demand that it be on a truly neutral site and make sure that the moderators are either neutral or each gets to pick one. Last night on Watters, Clay Travis said he had a brilliant idea. Each candidate picks a moderator who will question the other candidate. Trump’s pick would question SK and her pick would question him.

It is a great idea, but I either ranted about it or discussed with some of you over a year ago and my suggestion was that Mark Levin question Magoo (now SK) and Rachel Maddow question Trump. That would be must see tv and she would absolutely refuse to do it because she knows that she can’t answer unscripted questions.

(BTW: I deleted my last rant and put Seger where he should have been.)

Now I had not planned to rant about Swift’s endorsement of SK. However one of you HS texted me out of the blue about it and even went so far as to do the research on her academic background. She left high school in her junior year to pursue her musical career and later got her diploma via homeschooling. She never went to college. So I figured I would address it.

First I’ve never been a Swift fan. I considered her as bubblegum country and have never heard any of her songs since she went pop other than when someone covers one of them on Idol or the Voice. She’s attractive but so what?. If you are going to vote for SK because Swift endorsed her then you should probably not be voting.

Now if you look at why she said she endorsed her, it gets worse. She said she did her homework and research and came to the conclusion that her policies were best. PROBLEM: what policies? She has none as she demonstrated last night. The only ones she has are the ones she is now trying to disavow. If Taylor likes the changed positions then she should endorse Trump because as he said last night her new ‘positions’ are his positions. The only thing that is clear is that Taylor is one more person who thinks the only issue is deproductive rights.

I personally don’t think celebrity endorsements mean anything. Anyone who votes based on them was already going to vote that way.

If this had occurred in a court case and I had taken notes, my rant would have taken several more pages. It’s the best I could do at my advanced senility off the cuff.

I am starting this at the first and I believe last break SK is well prepared and lying through her teeth and he is not calling her out on it and more importantly he’s not answering the questions. All he had to do is say that he would veto a national abortion ban, but he didn’t. That was a big mistake. And when he talked about the governor of Virginia, he said West Virginia, but later got it right, and about Tampon Tim and said that they had said they would allow a baby that survived an abortion to be left to die. And she denied it and the female moderator said that was not true and there is no state in country that allows that and Trump didn’t respond as I expected he would by pointing out that TT signed a bill that said medical personnel had no duty to take care of that child. He apparently didn’t do his homework like she did.

Buckle up because this is going to take a while.

Trump spent too much time evading questions and instead fell back on his basic rally talking points and she lied about everything. She said so many times that it is time to ‘turn the page’ that she probably owes royalties to Bob Seger and the Silver Bullet Band, and he never once said the page is yours. He let her get away with the lies about Covid and didn’t say what I put up recently that the lost jobs were due to Dem governors.

When she carried on about his supposed racism, he didn’t say my family never owned slaves!

When she said she would be a stronger president on the world stage and that Trump was a laughing stock on the world stage, he didn’t ask her why there were no wars when he was president and there are two now and China is threatening Taiwan if she’s so strong.

I thought he missed a great opportunity when she said in defending Ukraine that the preeminent basis for international law is the integrity of borders and he didn’t respond that apparently you don’t think that applies to our borders!

She was never held to respond to her flip flops and he didn’t force her to respond.

He did a good job on J6 but didn’t go far enough.

And on the Afghanistan withdrawal he never held her feet to the fire and demand a response to why neither she nor Magoo have ever contacted the families of the 13 soldiers killed during the withdrawal.

I may have more tomorrow but that’s all I can put up extemporaneously without notes.

I am doing this mainly because there hasn’t been anything really new in a while and I want you to know I’ve not gone senile yet. All that’s been happening is replaying Kama Chameleon flip flops. And even VDH has been boring lately. He has to produce a few articles every week, which fortunately I don’t have to do, and so he’s put out just recaps basically.

So here’s what I will discuss tonight. I expect things to pick up after the debate. But first SK put out a policy statement today and it was a big nothing burger. No substance just platitudes. What’s an opportunity economy? She wants to make sure everyone has the opportunity to buy a car and a house. Everyone can do that now if they have the money to do so and that won’t change unless she is really talking about an equity economy in which everyone is given these things by the government. And that’s communism.

Next she keeps saying that if she’s president she will abolish the filibuster to pass the GND. I know she was a DEI law student but she was a US Senator and should know that the filibuster is a senate rule that can only be changed by the Senate. The president has no say in the matter.

And lastly I’ve heard several clips of her refusing to specify at what week she would ban abortions. She instead keeps saying that she wants to make Roe v Wade the law of the land. I was in law school when that decision came out and I’ve read it and studied it. But here’s my point. If it comes up in the debate Trump, should ask her to explain what that case held and then sit back and watch her dissemble. I’m sure she couldn’t explain her position.

I will certainly have something to say after the debate.

I saw today that Judge Merchan has pushed back sentencing in the hush money case until November 26 th after the election. More importantly, he pushed back his decision on whether to throw out the case because of the Supremes decision on presidential immunity until November 12th. As I have said continuously the more important Supreme Court case is the one where the Supremes said all required elements must be unanimously decided and in this case they clearly were not.

At any rate I believe that this is a clear indication that he will throw the case out. If he was going to deny the motion there would be no reason to postpone that decision. But if he’s going to throw it out he wouldn’t want to do it before the election because that would be a huge victory for Trump and destroy a lot of SK’s talking points.

Magoo told another story today in Pittsburgh about his great grandfather who was supposedly a Molly McQuire. Look it up and watch it. They played it on Gutfeld and the thing that struck me was when Magoo said he remembered in 1906 what his ancestor said. Explain to me how someone born almost forty years later could remember that. He didn’t say he had heard or been told what was said but that he heard it.

I have been ranting for a few years about how SK fornicated her way into politics. Willie Brown, a married man, thirty one years her elder appointed her to two commissions she was not qualified for that paid her $400K over either two or four years and that required her attendance for a few days a year. There’s a word that is usually applied to women who trade sex for money which I’m sure you can recall. And he also bankrolled with his cronies her DA and AG elections. This was all verboten until just recently.

Then a few days ago an article appeared in the Federalist that said if the left can go after Trump for Stormy Daniels and other things then SK’s peccadillos are fair game. It was up for three days and I believe it was still up this morning but now it’s not and once again I’m too lazy to look it up. And now it appears that at least some on Fox have taken the hint. On both the Five and Gutfeld they are talking about Willie and his side piece. It’s about time!

My apologies because I usually pride myself on being able to connect the dots and I haven’t on a point I mentioned last night. I like most people have been treating SK’s prosecutorial career as separate from her national political career. They are not.

I have commented in the past on what it takes to be a good litigator and so won’t repeat it. Suffice it to say that you need to be fast on your feet and capable of processing and responding to information on the fly. If there’s anything we’ve learned about SK, it’s that she can’t do it. Leave her without a teleprompter or notes and she fails open every time.So there’s no way she could have ever been a decent trial attorney. She just doesn’t have the smarts. She was a DEI law student and a DEI vice president. She’s just plain dumb and so it’s clear why she’s hiding from anything approaching a legitimate interview or press conference. She’s doing everything she can to avoid the debate with Trump. She knows she can’t do it.

I came across the article below which agrees with me and the author has real experience in the California criminal justice system. And he doesn’t pull any punches. Enjoy.

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2024/09/02/dodging-the-debate-would-be-smart-because-kamala-isnt-n2644175

I was going to call my response to the taped and edited ‘interview’ Macbeth 2.0 but there was no sound and no fury. There were two idiots, but that wasn’t enough. I held off commenting that night because I was lazy and I’m glad I did because most everything I would have said was said by everyone else the next morning and you don’t need me to state the obvious. At least I hope that’s not what you expect to see here.

The only thing I will say about it is that when SK talked about guidelines around time, I thought she was about a nanosecond from devolving into the significance of the passage of time. She didn’t but it was already so stupid she didn’t need to. I will say that her speaking style is a cross between a kindergarten teacher explaining something she doesn’t understand herself to young children and nails on a chalkboard.

Moving on to the actual purpose of this rant, I saw where she said she didn’t ban fracking as vice president, it might have been in the interview or it might have been somewhere else, I’m not sure and am once again too lazy to look it up. People there is no such thing as a VP Executive Order! She had no authority to on her own ban fracking. No one asked her to explain how she could have done it.

Now the real reason for this rant is to question SK’s prosecutorial experience. She repeatedly said she tried hundreds of felony cases in her 13 years as a line prosecutor. However, when challenged in a debate when she ran for San Francisco DA she admitted it was more like fifty. That’s about four a year. And I’m sure none of them were OJ type cases or we would have heard of her. Most of her cases were probably two or three days against an underfunded public defender. So she was as lazy then as she is now. She spent most of her time ingratiating herself with the powers that be to climb the ladder of power. In any DA’s office in a big city there are way more cases than can be prosecuted and hence the vast majority are ended by a plea bargain. Had she wanted to actually do her job she could have tried 50 or more a year. She’s a lazy, low IQ, bum who only cares about aggrandizing herself and nothing else.

Over the course of 25 years I tried about 100 cases but that was because that was all of the cases there were. Actually there were probably another ten or fifteen cases which I assigned to other attorneys because they occurred at the same time as cases I was working on. I didn’t have an endless stream of cases to pick and choose and I still managed to be as active as she was. Also I had had responsibility for many other areas including national security as I have mentioned before. She had no other responsibilities.

Also as I mentioned above, I’m sure that few if any of her trials lasted as much as a week. Most of mine lasted at least a week and several lasted three to six weeks. I’d be willing to bet she never tried a case that lasted that long. She can’t think coherently for a 20 minute interview much less a three week trial. She’s always been a grifter!

And one last thing, she makes a big deal about protecting children from predators. Nothing could be further from the truth. When she became San Francisco DA there were 500 pending child molestation cases being investigated against priests in that diocese and ready to go before a grand jury. When she got elected, they all somehow disappeared, and the number reached 1100 when she was AG. The diocese of San Francisco is a powerful political power in San Francisco and she put their wishes over the welfare of the children. She’s a political whore.