I had planned to write this this afternoon but then Judge Pirro covered my main observations on the Five. However she didn’t take it to ground so I will.

First let me say that Hur did a good job except for his nonsensical decision not to prosecute. Now keep in mind that under DOJ rules he couldn’t have indicted Magoo while he was in office, much less prosecuted him. However as we have seen with Trump he could have indicted and prosecuted him after he loses in November and I sincerely hope that whoever Trump makes his Attorney General will prosecute Magoo and I don’t give a damn if the Dems go bat shit crazy.

Now I believe that Hur was wrong in the basis of his decision to not prosecute because Magoo is mentally dead and therefore a DC jury would likely acquit him. That’s not his job as a prosecutor. If he has the evidence that a crime was committed then he needs to take it to a grand jury and get an indictment. It’s up to the defense to put forth an affirmative defense that Magoo is non compos mentis. They would either have to put on an expert to say that or put Magoo on the stand to prove it and there is no way any competent defense attorney would ever put Magoo on the stand.

Next I believe that Hur’s talking about his chances in DC is a red herring. Classified documents were found in both Delaware and Pennsylvania. I don’t recall any documents being found in DC. So why is he concerned with a DC jury? And even if there were some, and I don’t recall where the space he shared with the Chinese that had classified documents was located. It might have been in DC. But Hur could bring the case in Delaware or Pennsylvania. In fact he could have brought cases in both covering the illegal documents in each jurisdiction.

Now there has been a lot of nonsense once again about who could do what with respect to classification and declassification authority and I’m amazed that none of these people know what they’re talking about and have obviously never read the controlling Executive Order. I have covered it extensively and will not repeat it here. Go back and read it again if you forget.

Now here is the one point that wasn’t asked of Hur that I wanted to hear. When Magoo 40 years ago knowingly and willingly took classified documents that you weren’t entitled to have and kept them in places that they were not allowed to be, was he mentally competent? Of course he was, although I personally never believed that he was even remotely bright, and that is the issue. You can’t claim years after your crimes that now you’re an idiot and quite frankly I don’t believe that Magoo would ever admit that he’s mentally impaired.

Another thing that came up is the supposed difference between how Trump responded to the investigation and how Magoo did with the bs being that Trump didn’t cooperate and Magoo did. Trump showed the documents to the FBI a month before the raid and told them that they could take whatever they wanted and all they asked was that he put another padlock on the door which he did.

Magoo was not raided and given advanced notice of what and where was going to be searched and according to what I heard today Magoo “discovered “ classified documents a year and a half before he fessed up. Who knows what he destroyed or hid in that period of time. One question I would have loved to be asked is did any of the classified documents found concern Ukraine?

There is a lot more that I could discuss but I think this is enough

Now that the left (Stephanopoulos) has decided to slander Trump as a rapist and ask an actual rape victim (Nancy Mace) how she can support him. If you haven’t seen or heard it, look it up and see how she destroyed him. But the point I want to make, and as ranted about before after the trial, Trump was never found guilty of rape and that was in a civil case with preponderance of the evidence is the standard of proof in a civil case. He was never convicted of rape in a criminal case which would have the burden of proof of beyond and to the exclusion of all reasonable doubt. The point is that Trump was found guilty in the civil case of the lesser charge of sexual abuse, which if you remember because I talked about it at the time, according to the judge’s instructions could include almost anything, even patting someone on the ass which they later decided was offensive to them.

Whenever they bring this up, the Trump camp needs to ask about Tara Reade who credibly accused Magoo of sexual assault including digital penetration. Turn it back on them and don’t respond to the rape nonsense. Point out that Trump was never found to have raped anyone.

This is going to be a quickie. Clearly Magoo said Lincoln. Watch it as many times as you like but there is no way that he said Laken. However I would like to make the observation that I can’t tell in the majority cases that the pundits actually say Laken and pronounce it differently from Lincoln. Maybe it’s my old ears but generally they don’t pronounce them differently. Anyone agree with me?

I was going to comment on Adam Schitt trying to get security briefings that Trump will get when he’s the Republican candidate will be dumb down briefings because Trump can’t be trusted with classified information. It’s all over the news today but the one thing that struck me, and I haven’t seen or heard today, is Schitt’s statement that there is one of the candidates who has been shown to mishandle classified information and of course that is Magoo. However he said it’s Trump. Tomorrow the Special Counsel that investigated Magoo’s illegal handling of classified information and there is no doubt that he did so will testify before Congress. Maybe someone will ask that question. On the other hand, Trump has been charged but has legitimate claims that he was entitled under the presidential records act and his authority as president to do what he did, and you know I believe Trump is right.

One interesting thing that has happened in that case is that the judge recently accepted two amicus briefs in the case from conservative sources which is not unusual, but the left is apoplectic because she wrote that they were helpful and that could mean she might toss the case. The hearing on Trump’s motion to have the case dismissed is this Thursday. Let’s hope she does the right thing.

ICYMI it turns out that the entire case in Georgia may have to be thrown out. And I’m ranting about this and not the SOTU because there’s nothing I could say that hasn’t been said ad nauseam. Magoo was on some drugs and as I have said previously, it’s why he’s always late because they’re trying to make sure he got the right dosage. He screamed the whole thing except when he went for his creepy whisper and lied his ass off the whole time. Standard Magoo except for the screaming and speed of his delivery. It’s more obvious than ever that he was drugged because he went out campaigning on Friday and Saturday and was his normal stumbling bumbling self. He couldn’t read the teleprompter or form coherent thoughts.

Now the reason for this rant is that since it involves a legal issue many may not have seen it and/or fully understood it. The issue is that the phone call between Trump and Raffensperger was the basis for Fani’s prosecution of Trump in Georgia. Unfortunately for her, the person who recorded the call was Jordan Fuchs, Raffensperger’s chief of staff. She was in Florida when she recorded it.

Under the US constitution, a person can record a conversation surreptitiously without the other person’s consent because the Supremes decided that when you decided to share the information you basically waived any claim of privacy. So that is the rule in all federal prosecutions. However, in state prosecutions the admissibility of recorded conversations depends on state law. Florida, and I can assure you of this because I went to law school there, and 13 or 14 other states require both parties to the conversation to agree to record it.

Now that is important because the Supremes have held that not only is the recording inadmissible but also any evidence that was discovered because of the recording. It’s called the “fruit of the poisonous tree “ rule and would appear to make Fani’s entire case to be inadmissible since the recording was the basis for everything that followed.

Now this has only come up in the last few days and I don’t know if Trump’s lawyers were aware but I would imagine that they will be raising it shortly. What I don’t know is whether Georgia considers evidence that is inadmissible in the state in which it was gathered to be inadmissible in Georgia when the recording would be admissible if it had been made in Georgia. I’m assuming that Georgia is not a two party consent state or none of this would matter.

Apparently when Fani became aware of the problem, she called her before the grand jury and granted her immunity. I don’t know how she could grant immunity for actions occurring outside her jurisdiction. For example could she grant immunity to anyone who committed murder in Florida? NO!! If there is some strange way she could pull this off, then I would love to see Trump contact the appropriate state attorney in Florida where she illegally recorded the call and make a complaint and get Fuchs indicted and prosecuted. De Santis might be willing to assist and as I have said before it’s time to put the shoe on the other foot.

Anyway I hope that between this and all the perjury and unethical behavior from Fani that the Georgia case disappears.

Today Caitlin set the all time record for points in NCAA basketball. She even surpassed Pete Maravich who was amazing. I got to see him live one time at Florida.

She is amazing and I thoroughly enjoyed the game. I haven’t watched a woman’s basketball game in quite a while but it was thoroughly enjoyable. The whole game was interesting and the play was better than most of the men’s games. Damn those girls threw down a bunch of 3-pointers. More than I have seen in most men’s games. And Caitlin was stellar. She needed 18 points to pass Pistol Pete and she got them in the first half and ended the game with I think 35 points. And I’m sure she will get many more with the games and tournaments left.

I put up the link below because black women can’t stand that a white woman just beat a woman’s record previously held by a black woman. They even lied about it and when exposed they turned to Kendi to claim that blacks can never be racist.

https://pjmedia.com/miltharris/2024/03/03/is-hating-white-players-the-new-face-of-basketball-n4926961

As I have said before, I don’t give anyone a pass. I throughly enjoy Levin and think he is brilliant. However on his show tonight he led off with a segment with statistics about how much crime was occurring in 2017, 2018 and 2019 due to illegal aliens and blamed it on Magoo. Unfortunately Trump was president during that time. Magoo didn’t take over until 2021. I don’t know why he did it. Maybe that’s the latest statistics he could get but I find it unbelievable that he would do something that is so obviously and transparently wrong. I expect better from him

I heard Nikki say today that Trump can’t win the general and the reason she knows this is because he didn’t get more than 40% of the votes in the first couple primaries and people who don’t do that can’t win the general. Do you see how stupid she is? She only got a small fraction of the votes that Trump did. So doesn’t that logically mean she couldn’t win either?

ICYMI today the University of Florida fired any and every one associated with DEI!! Good to see them kick the nonsense off campus and out of the curriculum.

There are now three cases in front of the Supreme Court that are directly related to the election.

First there is the issue of whether some state court judge or official, like the state Secretary of State, can take Trump off the ballot. I think the answer is pretty clear and I expect at least an 8-1 decision from the Supremes. There are only three requirements under the constitution. You’ve got to be at least 35 years old, have been a resident of the US for 14 years and in the words of Bruce Springsteen been ‘Born in the USA’! That’s it and no state can change the constitution. That’s why even if Trump gets convicted of something, he can still run for president.

The second case, and I’m not sure if Trump has joined this case or not, involves the construction of obstructing an official proceeding. At least two hundred of the J6 defendants have been charged under that statutory provision. And of great importance, a significant number of the charges in Smith’s J6 case against Trump are based on that statute. Thus if the Supremes find that that statute is not relevant, a large portion of smith’s bogus case goes up in smoke. And I think that that’s what they will do because first of all, at least 4 justices must vote to grant certiorari and hear the case. And the statute involved is an outgrowth of the Enron or Exxon case and never considered that it would be used in the way it is.

And lastly there is the question of presidential immunity. This is more complicated because the constitution doesn’t specifically grant any immunity to the president. It does however grant immunity to senators and representatives.

The Speech or Debate Clause is a clause in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 6, Clause 1). The clause states that “The Senators and Representatives” of Congress“shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrestduring their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.”

This maybe necessary because the framers were concerned with things like the president arresting opposition party members to keep them from voting on legislation. However it is clearly subject to gross abuse without recourse. There is nothing to stop one of these officials from getting up at the podium where we see them all the time giving insane speeches about pretty much anything. There is nothing to stop them from saying you’re having sex with all your children and the family pets and you would defenseless.

BTW if you recall that’s why I said that Kyle Rittenhouse should sue Magoo for defamation because he was neither a senator or VP when he made the remarks.

I have looked at the cases and I’m sure they will recognize some immunity for Trump but I don’t know how far it will go and I hope that they address the issue of whether any immunity lasts beyond his term. Magoo waived Trump’s immunity which I don’t think he can but if he can it would be good to know so that when Trump wins he can immediately waive Magoo and Obama privileges and get all their crap into the public domain.

I guess this isn’t really helpful but it does explain the need for the Supremes to take up the case, contrary to all the bs being spewed by the MSM. Future presidents need to know the boundaries of their privilege and whether it makes them less likely to make tough but necessary decisions.

Just a quick update to let you know that I haven’t forgotten the subject and their models are intentional bs.