Today this moron and 68 of his Dem colleagues came out demanding that the Trump J6 trial be put live on TV. And I agree which means one of us is an idiot and I’m pretty sure it’s not me. So let me explain.

I thought he had been a US Attorney in Southern California before he became a congressman man and must have forgotten what a real trial is like. I was wrong. I looked it up and he went to Stanford undergrad and then to Harvard law, which as you know from following me, in the words of Shania Twain — that don’t impress me much. In point of fact he was an Assistant USA in Southern California for a year or so in around 1990 before running for office in the California Legislature and then ultimately in Congress. And he’s now running to replace brain dead Feinstein and I would actually prefer Feinstein. She would do less harm to the country.

Okay so what’s my point? Schitt is either a complete idiot or forgot everything he ever knew about real criminal trials. They are not grand jury proceedings where only the prosecution puts forward its case with no input from the defense on either the facts or the bogus law of Smith.

More importantly they are not Hollywood produced mockumentaries where you put on your side, deceptingly edit video and allow no response from the other side.

In a criminal trial, when Smith puts up his bs witnesses, Trump’s attorneys get to destroy them on cross examination and the Trump team has indicated that they intend to methodically eviscerate the fraud in the 2020 election. Hooray! I put up just a modicum of potential cross yesterday and could easily write at least a novella more. And no don’t ask because I’m not going to do it unless Trump wants to pay me what he’s paying his attorneys which have so far been a disappointment to me.

Now the other thing that makes me want to have the trial broadcast is something that they danced around and didn’t understand on the Five today. A live broadcast would curtail the judge from acting the fool and this judge is just that. But even she will not want the world to see her as a partisan hack.

I was going to rant about this but originally decided not to because the sheriff in Atlanta said he would take Trump’s mugshot and finger print him. I originally didn’t rant because they covered it on the Five. But I decided to because Gutfeld said a t shirt with the mugshot on it would be a bestseller and I’m sure that’s true but I believe that as I told one of you before Trump’s first arraignment, the real best seller would be a mugshot mug. I would certainly buy one and am willing to bet that Trump already has set up the machinery in place to turn out production as soon as the mugshot is taken. It would be a huge fundraising coup.

One other thing that I’ll mention is that since most of you are in my age group, fingerprinting is not what it used to be. During the course of my government career I was fingerprinted several times as a matter of course and it involved putting your fingers on an ink pad and then having an official roll them on a paper pad.

That’s not what is done anymore. When I went in to get my gun permit, that’s not what’s done anymore. You put your fingers on something like an iPad and that’s it.

Actually it was before the Bragg arraignment in New York

I meant to do this earlier but I’m doing it now. The cackler keeps saying that Florida’s curriculum on slavery should be based on the stories of descendants of actual slaves. In point of fact, that’s exactly what it is. The funny thing is that this screed is coming from the descendant of a family who owned slaves. Please someone call her out. She has no basis for her nonsense. She has the perspective of an overseer!

Contrary to my normal laziness, I actually downloaded the indictment and read much of it until my intolerance for bullshit reached its limit. Now before I go any further, I want to explain why there was no count about the actual J6 riots or insurrection as the left would have it. As I reminded one of you yesterday, not long after that day the then Magoo DOJ came out with a report clearly stating that Trump wasn’t responsible for the riots. Even in DC you would be hard pressed to convince a jury that Trump was guilty when your own agency said otherwise.

Now I’m not going to rehash how bad the indictment is. Any of you who read this have heard numerous legal experts like Turley and McCarthy and Dershowitz and others obliterate this ridiculous indictment. So what I am going to do is deal with the one main issue that is at the heart of this travesty. Namely that Trump knew he lost and still spewed the falsity that the election was stolen.

Apparently, Jack Smith hasn’t kept up with the news. So let me enlighten him. The indictment actually cites the ballot fraud in Atlanta which I have previously discussed but will again. In the indictment it cites the ass covering Georgia officials who said nothing to see here. The video was taken out of context because it was just a 90 second clip. I have no idea what they are talking about because I watched more than 90 seconds and there is no getting around the obvious. First there were no observers in the room when they pulled out the suitcases and started counting contrary to Georgia law. And there is no way to ignore that on the video one woman put a group of ballots through the machine and then pulled them out and put them through the machine two more times. I would love to see Smith try to explain that or better yet have the scumbag Raffensperger have to explain under cross examination how these obvious violations of Georgia law are standard practice. He would devolve into the pile of dog shit that he is.

And staying with this degenerate, the indictment also says Trump knew the Dominion voting machines in Georgia were not capable of manipulation. If you’ve been following you know that a few weeks ago I put up articles proving that the machines could change votes and the idiot Raffensperger hid it for two years and then said he wouldn’t put in the patches to get rid of the vulnerabilities until after 2024.

Now I could go on but just remember at least two swing state supreme courts have declared that the changes made to voting by courts and secretaries of state and election officials were unconstitutional and that the 2020 results invalid.

The last thing I will comment on is my observation of the similar problem between Bragg and Smith. Both are alleging that Trump took actions after the election to interfere with citizens right to vote. A nonstarter. In both cases voters had already voted and had their ballots counted. Now Smith is a little different because he’s alleging that Trump was trying to prevent the already counted votes from counting? You are not disenfranchised if you voted multiple times, you are not being disenfranchised if only one of them counts and you are not being disenfranchised by Trump if your state and local officials illegally changed rules and maybe not your fault if your vote doesn’t count. Blame them not Trump.

One thing that occurred to me is that the reason Trump was successful in 2016 and is way ahead now is because he rejected all the supposedly brilliant ‘conservative’ campaign pundits. It’s also why they hate him. He cut off their self entitled grift. That just drove them crazy not being able to eat from the trough.

It’s also why Vivek Ramaswamy is going to pass RDS shortly. He’s running his own campaign and is not part of the swamp and is not cowtowing to the perpetual loser pundits. Like Trump he is a political outsider who has actually successfully accomplished things in the real world.

Which brings me to RDS. He should have done better, but unfortunately he hired a bunch of these leeches and all he got for it was a massive drain on campaign funds and all he got was the usual losing ideas which resulted in him dropping precipitously in the polls. He has apparently booted many of them and it remains to be seen whether he can recover. It’s historically unlikely but time will tell.

As you know I have twin 36 year old sons. One of them is going back to UNCG this semester and will need probably two semesters to complete his degree. He previously attended there as an instate student, which he was and is. He has lived in this state since 2008, is a registered voter and has voted in this state and has never lived anywhere else. He has lived in no other state since 2008, and now a computer is saying he’s out of state. It’s about an $8000 a semester difference and so it’s not a small thing.

And that’s right a computer is responsible. He has talked to his counselor and she said that he obviously was instate and she did what she could but basically he had to get the computer to change its mind. He called the admissions office and even went in with proof of his NC residency and citizenship and they agreed but they said there was nothing they could do to override the computer’s decision. I think this is beyond stupid and one would think that an institution of higher learning would have the ability to correct obvious mistakes. Apparently not so.

Unfortunately I’m not admitted in this state because I had no intention of practicing law here and therefore saw no need to incur the expense and requirements. If I was I would go to the University President and tell him to either override his dumbass computer or I would sue him personally as well as the university and just for shits and giggles throw in a count of depriving my son of his rights. As a citizen of NC he is entitled to all the rights and privileges that come with that status including the right to attend a NC university at instate tuition prices.

I suggested he go to a legal aid clinic and get them to do what I said above. Alternatively I suggested that he go to one of those action news programs and get them to ask the university president on camera, “who runs this university, you or some computer?” I guarantee on camera he would change his tune. Most likely he would do the right thing to avoid being on camera looking like an idiot. I also told him to contact his local state representative.

I haven’t heard anything from him today so I guess things must be moving in the right direction.

I believe it is Matt Gaetz, but it could be several others, who have said that a law needs to be passed that places the venue for any criminal case involving a senator or congressman or president or vice president, to be in the place that person resides. That would eliminate the DC swamp bias.

I know one of you listened to Bongino today and I enjoyed most of his points but I think that once again you can know too much and miss the obvious. His main point was that under White House and Secret Service protocols Hunter could never get through to Magoo without it going through many protocols and arrangements.

Now here’s what I think he completely missed or ignored. Magoo had at least six private emails that were used to carry out his pay to play scheme. Please tell me how hard it would be for Magoo and Hunter to have burner phones so that when Hunter called, Magoo would know who it was and take the call. Also supposedly several of the calls were initiated by Magoo so with or without a private phone it could easily be arranged. Dan should know better. I guess if you have a hammer everything looks like a nail.

As I mentioned to one of you earlier, the indictment today was just part of the same old tired playbook. Magoo and the mafia get exposed and destroyed yesterday. Look over here at this shiny new object. I will comment further maybe tomorrow but the charges look pretty much out to lunch.

As I told one of you, I’m not going to rant about Devon until later in the week when the transcript is released. However I will say this. First until the transcript is available we don’t know if Devon said they only discussed the weather.

More importantly, it’s what was being discussed before the phone call that matters. Were they discussing some influence peddling scheme and asked Hunter to prove he had instant access to Magoo? I’m hoping that the republicans were smart enough to nail it down, but we won’t know until we can see for ourselves.