Magoo and the morons are planning on putting out a rule change to Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that would change the meaning of sex, not gender which wasn’t in the Act, to be defined as gender identity to basically codify the right of men to compete in women’s sports. It’s absurd and inspite of all the nonsense being discussed now, the only way to end this leftist power grab and protect women is for the Supreme Court to decide the issue and they have a case coming to them that gives them the opportunity to restore reality. Unfortunately they passed on taking it on an expedited basis but it will still reach them on a normal track probably within a year or less. And there will be many more state suits before then if Magoo goes forward with his nonsense. Kristi Noem has already said South Dakota will sue.

Now any of you who have followed my nonsense from the beginning will know that I have previously discussed this issue. In point of fact SEX was added to the act as an attempt by a Dem senator or congressman to try to kill the bill because who would ever vote for equal rights for women? He’s now a celebrated as a civil rights icon.

In 1964 gender wasn’t a thing. Yes the word existed but the real term was sex and meant male or female or fornication but the latter was not part of the legislation. No senator or congressman even remotely thought they were voting on a law that would allow men to put on a wig and a skirt and be protected as a woman, and I guarantee you that they never intended Title IX to allow men to play women’s sports. The opposite is true. They wanted to make sure that women athletes had an opportunity for the same number of college scholarships as male athletes. (It’s not for this rant to deal with but this was wrong and I don’t think what they really wanted. Football pays for most other college sports and with male basketball surely does.)

So my point is that the Supremes have no choice but to reject Magoo’s nonsense. I’m sure that at least five of them will reject it and send it to congress to amend the act which they will never do.

And lastly will someone explain to me why the far left is so intent on disadvantaging real women?