I was going to call it a correction but it just proves what I said yesterday. Today the Capitol police (aka the keystone cops) indicated that when they saw the cop lights at the Pelosi compound, they turned on the rest of the cameras and back up the video and saw a man in his undies take a hammer bust out the window according to people who have allegedly seen the video. Now we know that is total bs because all the broken glass was on the outside and according to the laws of physics that can’t happen if the window was struck from the outside. And here’s something that bears mentioning because as I previously mentioned the window that was broken was much farther from the door lock than just breaking the glass on the door, and one of you who is in a position to know, an architect said that glass in entry doors is required to be like the safety glass in your car. Upon impact it will splinter but because of the film in the middle it will not break.

So now as long as I’m free styling, let’s consider what this means. The person who broke the glass from the inside knew which glass to break. Does anyone think that the crazy guy in his skivvies had a clue about that, and I’m talking about the crazy guy in his skivvies not named Pelosi. But while I’m just making it up anyway, do any of you think that seriously drunk PP knew which window to break? Hell I didn’t know until last night and I doubt that even a sober PP would know. So who broke the window? Just asking.

Now here’s the plus part, although I didn’t realize that more than half of what appears above would be stream of consciousness. I saw either an article or interview today in Newsmax from Alan Dershowitz and I’m starting to have doubts about the man. Every time some big time pervert gets caught he seems to be involved. Think Epstein and the Lolita express. Today’s rant struck me as boarder line crazy. His whole screed was that the right was trying to besmirch poor PP when the facts are that the assailant was a Hitler loving right wing fanatic. Now I don’t know about you but I haven’t seen that anywhere so I don’t know where he got his information, and everything I’ve seen puts him clearly in left camp. So I just got to wonder what the relationship between PP and Dershowitz is?

First I watched Magoo’s speech and once again it was total bs. He said that voters were turning out in record numbers while still complaining about voter suppression. He didn’t talk about anything actually average citizens were concerned about like inflation and gas prices.

But here’s the point of this rant. Even Jesse missed the point of my earlier rant. He fell for the bs that because the Capitol police said they weren’t watching when the break In happened that means they don’t have video of what went on. Fortunately for you, I don’t just skip over nonsense. They have the video and you will never see it.

It just keeps getting weirder and weirder. Today I assume you saw that the Capitol police had quite a few years ago installed cameras outside of the Pelosi house in SF and one of the I believe eight was on and they were supposed to monitor it 24/7. And it was the one that covered the area of the alleged break in. They said they weren’t watching it constantly since Nancy was in DC. But they noticed it when the cops pulled up and the lights were flashing and then turned on the other seven cameras. Now here’s what’s weird. No police surveillance cameras instantaneously erase the video. It is stored to some media for probably at least a week or maybe a month and then either archived or deleted. So this necessarily means that they have video of the alleged assailant smashing the window with the glass flying back at him — NOT! And they said that they were wired into the security system so that if it was breached both them and SFPD would be notified immediately. That means that at 2am the system was turned off.

Once again we’re watching the gang who couldn’t shoot straight trying to cover up for Paulie P. That video plus the body cam video from the responding officers could clear up a lot but don’t hold your breath because it will be a long time if ever before we see them.

Henceforth pp. I’m too lazy to spend the effort on this degenerate. I saw a concerted effort to try to focus the attention on the alleged assailant today although all the evidence makes clear that this is not some MAGA crazed lunatic. It smells a lot more another Juicy hoax being perpetrated because pp got caught in flagrante delicto. There is just too much that makes absolutely no sense. The supposed fact that the assailant supposedly broke a window, and not the one in the door but one farther away making it harder to reach the lock and yet all the glass is outside not inside. Physics says that’s impossible. Looks like someone tried to create an after the fact scenario and was too stupid to know breaking the window from the inside would create an impossible scenario.

And there’s the fact that there was apparently no security at the house and no video on. The only way that’s possible is if pp turned it off because he didn’t want anyone to see what was going on.

And there’s also the third party mystery of who opened the door for the police. Initially the police said a third party opened the door when they knocked and they even said it in the first press briefing but now they are saying it was pp in his skivivies and Bongino said he’s willing accept the correction which makes him an idiot whose never tried a case and is incapable of connecting the dots. Okay if pp answered the door how did he end up simultaneously on the floor with the assailant? How did the cops let that happen. I could go on and about their bullshit, but you get the gist. There are way too many things that don’t make any sense in this nonsensical attempt to keep pp from once again being held responsible for his actions.

That’s Liam Neeson from Taken. And I debated myself, I said self, over doing this rant but decided do to interactions with one of you to do it because it made me think of why I can comment hopefully intelligently about a wide range of issues. Now first let me say that I know a lot of shit that you do not know, but the opposite is also true for at least the folks I know read my nonsense. You know a lot of things I don’t. And you’re all very intelligent people. Again I’m talking about the people I know that follow me. If AOC or her ilk read me that doesn’t apply to you. You don’t actually know anything an intelligent person would want to know.

Here’s the thing that finally occurred to me. I have three separate degrees and they are all in separate disciplines that are pertinent to much of today’s politics. If you have three degrees and they’re in the same discipline. A bachelors, masters and Ph.D in economics means you know a lot about nothing. Not a surprise to any of you because I think economics is just guessing.

I don’t know if any of you have advanced degrees. I know some of you don’t have bachelors degrees which makes absolutely no difference to me because I know you are smart and I always hung out with the sweathogs. There are a lot of people who have degrees and are completely idiots. Yeah once again I’m talking about you Don Lemon you have a degree in broadcast journalism which means you can read cue cards. We are all in awe. You know exactly zero about whatever bs you’re spouting.

Now to get back to the point of this rant, is because my three different degrees I have a broad range of actual formal education on a lot of pertinent things. With chemical engineering, I had both chemistry both qualitative and quantitative but physical chemistry and the dreaded organic chemistry. It also required calculus and differential equations and computer programming and then physics and quantum physics and then in engineering – statics and dynamics and fluid mechanics and chemical process industries and thermodynamics and engineering measurements including surveying and statistics.

Now moving on to my business degree it encompassed economics, both micro and macro, and finance and accounting and marketing and stocks and bonds and also statistics but it was silly after engineering statistics. And as I mentioned yesterday it covered evaluating the profitability of projects determining present value or future worth.

And then we get to law school where pretty much everything was covered. I won’t bore you with all the subjects but suffice it to say I studied pretty much everything that is relevant to today’s political discussions.

And as demonstrated previously my law career covered a vast expanse of experience and expertise and so I know a lot of shit about a lot of stuff and hopefully it allows me to provide insights to you.

So the point of this rant is not to say I’m smarter, I’m not but I have a very unique set of skills that give me insights that most won’t. I’d be surprised if there were anyone else with the same academic background.