Alright, I’m sure you heard today that the Supremes denied a challenge by a Pennsylvania legislator that wanted the Supremes to enjoin the state of Pennsylvania from certifying the results because he claimed that a legislative change to the voting laws allowing mail in voting violated the Pennsylvania constitution. Legal ‘experts’ disagree on that point but the left treated it like it was the be all and end all decision.

Now I might be wrong but I don’t think it had anything to do with the case Justice Alito had required Pennsylvania to respond to today that concerns the Pennsylvania SC decision that votes could be received after the election and still be counted contrary to state law and also ballots without a postmark or an illegible postmark had to be counted and I think also that signature verification was not required. I believe that case which was also the much stronger case is still alive and well. The Supremes decision today was unanimous and I don’t see anyway that Alito would have voted that way, and btw this is the case that Ted Cruz has offered to argue and he is one of the most successful attorneys ever in Supreme Court appearances.

The other thing that happened today, which is a very good sign, is that the Supremes have accepted the Texas case and set up a briefing schedule. This means that a majority of the court think that the case is not frivolous!

Also, an update. Remember when I said I hadn’t heard of Sydney Powell or Lin Wood filing a case seeking an injunction to prevent the same fraud from being perpetrated in the senate runoffs. Today the RNC filed such a suit and so I have to believe I was right and Powell and Wood need to shut up about not voting in the Georgia runoffs.