I am sick and tired of all the people on Fox News and Newsmax refusing to name the whistleblower. Everyone knows it’s Eric Ciaramella. Quit pretending that he’s entitled to any protection. He’s not a whistleblower he’s a felonious gossip. Grow some balls and name him and quit pretending that he’s entitled to any protection. As I’ve previously stated he’s not covered by the whistleblower statute they are talking about. STAND UP!

Not a real serious point, but watching this nonsense because they are using an overhead we get to see that a lot of these guys are going bald. It reminds me of a time when a new chairman at my agency had a meeting to address all the senior executives in the agency at a DC hotel and I sat in a seat in the balcony and was amazed to see how many of my fellow executives were going bald. I would never have known because at face level you wouldn’t know.

I’ve had a few people ask why there shouldn’t be witnesses since apparently 70% of the people think there should be according to a recent survey. This is a bogus survey. It’s like asking would you rather watch an MMA fight or paint drying? And the proof for my position is already evident. No one is watching Schiff and company. Stations are already putting on their regularly scheduled programs. Nobody can watch Schiff and Nadler lie for twenty four hours. It is beyond boring. I heard one caller on a radio talk show today say he was having trouble getting to sleep at night so he recorded Schiff and plays it when he goes to bed and now has no problem falling asleep.

One thing that I heard today that makes a lot of sense is that Schiff and company don’t really want witnesses because they know that they will likely be exposed for their corruption as noted in my last rant. What they want is to get Republican senators that they consider vulnerable on the record voting against witnesses so they can campaign on their bogus coverup narrative.

I think that that may really be their strategy. However, they are ignoring the other side of this issue. Namely that vulnerable Dems are going to have to vote to convict Trump and that is not going to helpful to their chance of reelection.

I read a very informative article in Real Clear Investigations that clearly lays out the corruption involved in the supposed whistleblower complaint and makes clear that it started just after Trump was sworn in because they wanted to set foreign policy instead of the president. I think you will find it interesting and informative. https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/01/22/whistleblower_was_overheard_in_17_discussing_with_ally_how_to_remove_trump_121701.html

I tried to get the actual link to put this up, but was unable to figure out how. Anyway, today Mark Levin gave what would be his opening statement if he was representing the president in this bogus impeachment. To see it go to YouTube and put in Mark Levin’s opening statement in the Trump impeachment hearing. It will answer all your questions about what’s really going on.

Do any of you reading this rant believe that the Dems won’t raise another ‘bombshell’ needing new witnesses during the next two weeks?

First I saw that the problem with the Pensacola terrorist iPhone was that he shot through both of them and thus probably disabled the facial recognition or thumbprint features.

The other thing is I can’t stand to hear one more Dem tell me the House impeachment articles are airtight and then tell me that it’s a coverup if they can’t get new evidence that they don’t have. These two positions are mutually exclusive. Hopefully the Republicans will grow a spine and not cave.

One of the most likely few followers of my nonsense sent me the following cite to an article in the NY Post laying out the corruption of the Bidens. Enjoy!

https://nypost.com/2020/01/18/how-five-members-of-joe-bidens-family-got-rich-through-his-connections/?utm_campaign=iosapp&utm_source=message_app

I am watching the Next Revolution with Steve Hilton from last Saturday and the thing I noticed in his opening rant was George Will. It used to be that he was always a supremely buttoned up dandy with suit and tie perfect. Now he looks like a homeless person with no tie. As you may know if you read my old blog, I used to like Will, but since he became a never Trumper and was willing to let Hillary put in a Supreme Court that would destroy the constitution for the foreseeable future, I can’t stand him. Now I’m thrilled that apparently his priggisness is coming back to haunt his ass. I would be happy if he never worked again!